Abstract:China's great size and diversity give rise to serious principal-agent problems among tiers of government. The fiscal relationships between central and provincial governments over the period of economic reform are examined within an agency framework. Provincial governments have been responsible for most revenue collection and public spending, but they have done so within the consolidated state budget: central government takes, or gives, the difference between a province's revenue collection and expenditure. Five interrelated questions are posed. Does provincial expenditure depend on provincial revenue collection, i. e. to what extent are provinces fiscally self-sufficient? How does the pattern of provincial expenditure relate to provincial revenue and income level? Is fiscal redistribution equalizing, i.e. to what extent does central government redistribute revenue from rich to poor provinces? Does central government's marginal propensity to tax the provinces serve as a deterrent to their revenue collection? Do the arrangements create greater fiscal instability for central or provincial governments? The provincial governments retained an increasing proportion of their revenue collected over the reform period, and the extent of fiscal redistribution by the centre from the rich to the poor provinces correspondingly declined. An important reason for these trends is that revenue effort was sensitive to the various marginal tax rates—mostly high—imposed by central government on the provinces: the Laffer curve is alive and well and living in China. This helps to explain the fiscal reforms of the mid-1990s, the effects of which are not yet discernible.

Finance Separation of Powers and Peasants' Income Increase

The effect of"province-managing-county"reform on the urban-rural divide

Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Economic Growth:Empirical Evidence below the Provincial Level

Fiscal Decentralization,Economic Growth and Urban-Rural Income Gap:An Analysis Based on Inter-Provincial Panel Date

Fiscal Decentralization, Public Goods Supply and Urban-Rural Income Inequality in China

Fiscal Decentralisation and Local Economic Growth: Evidence from a Fiscal Reform in China

THE FENSHUIZHI REFORM,FISCAL DECENTRALIZATION,AND ECONOMIC GROWTH IN CHINA

Fiscal Decentralization, Equalization, and Intra-Provincial Inequality in China

Fiscal Decentralization,Market Segmentation and Economy Growth:Based on Analysis of Provincial Panel Data of 1996-2007

Fiscal Decentralization and China’s Provincial Economic Growth: a Panel Data Analysis for China’s Tax Sharing System

Fiscal Reform and Public Education Spending: A Quasi-natural Experiment of Fiscal Decentralization in China

China's Fiscal Decentralization and Environmental Quality: Theory and an Empirical Study

Fiscal Decentralization, Local Governments' Behavior and Regional Financial Development

Province-Managing-County Reform and Public Education Spending: A Quasi-Natural Experiment of Fiscal Decentralization in China

Fiscal Decentralization: Incentives, Redistribution and Reform in China

Compulsory Educational Fiscal Reforms and Urban-Rural Education Inequality in China: Empirical Analysis on Provincial Panel Data

How to Decentralize Fiscal Input of Compulsory Education in China? an Economic Analysis of Transition from County-based Decentralized System to Unified Management at Provincial Level

Impact of Income Inequality and Fiscal Decentralization on Public Health: Evidence from China

Revenue Sharing, Fiscal Incentives, and Economic Growth: Evidence from China

The Fiscal System Reform on Direct Province Control of Counties,Counties' Economic Growth and the Overcome of Fiscal Difficulties