Abstract:Objective To compare the efficacy of reversed less invasive stabilization system (LISS) and intramedullary fixation devices for treatment of femoral trochanteric fractures.Methods Data of 362 consecutive patients with femoral trochanteric fractures who were treated with reversed LISS or intramedullary fixation devices at our institution between March 2004 and May 2011 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 32 males and 38 females treated with reversed LISS.The mean age at injury was 73.4 years.There were 125 males and 167 females treated with intramedullary fixation.The mean age at injury was 74.7 years.The operation time,intraoperation blood loss and length of hospitalization were compared.The patients were asked to fill in a questionnaire of Harris hip score,and radiographs were used to evaluate the bone healing situation.Results The mean operation time was 120 min in reversed LISS group and 80 min in intramedullary group.The length of hospitalization was 12 days in reversed LISS group and 10 days in intramedullary group.More operation time and longer length of hospitalization were needed in reversed LISS group.The intraoperation blood loss was 100 ml in reversed LISS group and 100 ml in intramedullary group.There were 3 DVT in reversed LISS group,10 DVT and 3 PE in intramedullary group.No difference was found in the aspect of intraoperation blood loss,postoperative deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism rate.A total of 320 patients were successfully followed-up,including 63 in LISS group and 257 in intramedullary group.The median Harris score was 75 in LISS group and 77 in intramedullary fixation group respectively.There was no difference of hip function score between two groups.The implant-related complication rate was 11.1％ in reversed LISS group,including 7 implant breakages.In intramedullary fixation group,there were neck screw exiting in 2 patients and cutout in 9 patients.So the implant-related complication rate was 4.3％ in intramedullary fixation group,which is statistically lower.Conclusion Both reversed LISS and intramedullary are effective for the treatment of proximal femoral fractures.There were no major difference in functional outcome between LISS and intramedullary nail.Intramedullary nail is still the choice of priority in most unstable proximal femoral fractures.The implants related complications in reversed LISS group are higher than Intramedullary nail group.However,for the unstable fractures proximal femoral fractures with lateral wall fracture,in which nailing may be difficult,reversely using LISS may be a good alternative.

Treatment of Distal Femoral Fractures with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: a Multicentre Retrospective Investigation

Fractures of the Distal Radius Treated by Internal Fixation: a Retrospective Study of 105 Cases

Improved anterolateral approach to treatment of terminal femoral fractures

Open reduction and internal fixation combined with Ilizarov joint distraction for treatment of comminuted talar body fractures

[Retrospective Study of Therapy of Periprosthetic Femoral Supracondylar Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty with Open Reduction and Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Internal Fixation].

Surgical Treatments for Vancouver Type B1 Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures

Comparison Study of Two Surgical Options for Distal Tibia Fracture—minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Vs. Open Reduction and Internal Fixation

Long-term surgical outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with Hoffa-like tibial plateau fractures: a clinical study and analysis

Clinical Effect of Distal Radius Fracture Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Plate Fixation.

Evaluation of Results of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) of Fracture of Distal End of Femur with Intra-Articular Extension

Open reduction combined with a variable angle foot plate for treatment of acute Lisfranc fracture-dislocation

Clinical outcome of open reduction and internal fixation with 3.0 mm crossed cannulated screws for fractures of areaⅡof distal fibula

Comparison of Two-Staged ORIF and Limited Internal Fixation with External Fixator for Closed Tibial Plafond Fractures.

Network Meta-Analysis of Open Reduction Internal Fixation, Intramedullary Nail Fixation, and Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures

A retrospective study of open reduction and traction bed-assisted closed reduction intramedullary nailing for femoral shaft fracture

Treatment strategy of open and type C distal femoral fracture accompanied with patellar fracture

Clinical efficacy of internal fixation with locking compression plates in the treatment of patients with extremity fractures and the effect on the recovery of limb function

Comparison between open reduction with internal fixation to circular external fixation for tibial plateau fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment and outcome prognosis of patients with high-energy transsyndesmotic ankle fracture dislocation—the “Logsplitter” injury

Treatment of special proximal femoral fractures with less invasive stabilization system

Reversed Less Invasive Stabilization System Versus Intramedullary Fixation Devices for Femoral Trochanteric Fractures