Quantitative Detection of PCA3 mRNA and T1E4 mRNA-the Isoform of Fusion Gene TMPRSS2:ERG in Urine of Patients for the Early Clinical Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer

Dai Meijie,Kong Fanhui,Shen Mo,Zhou Wu,Chen Wei,Wu Xiuling,Weng Zhiliang,Tao Zhihua
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-548X.2011.09.008
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the utility of the quantitative detection of PCA3 mRNA and T1E4 mRNA(the isoform of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene) in urine after prostate massage for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.Methods T1E4 mRNA,PCA3 mRNA and PSA mRNA were measured by real-time fluorescent quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction(FQ-RT-PCR) based on taqman technique in urine samples of 53 PCa and 37 BPH patients after prostate massage.PSA mRNA was used to normalize the number of prostate cells and T1E4 mRNA/PSA mRNA ratio was then used as a diagnostic marker for prostate cancer.The diagnostic efficacies of T1E4 mRNA and PCA3 mRNA in urine samples were evaluated by the ROC curve.Then the diagnostic efficacies of detection of PCA3 mRNA and T1E4 mRNA were analyzed.Results AUC of T1E4 mRNA/PSA mRNA ratio was 0.802(95%CI:0.709~0.895).The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of T1E4 mRNA/PSA mRNA ratio were 56.6% and 94.6% at a cut off of 0.007.AUC of PCA3 mRNA/PSA mRNA ratio was 0.646(95%CI:0.533~0.758).The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of T1E4 mRNA/PSA mRNA ratio were 47.2% and 73.0%at a cut off of 0.001.The T1E4 mRNA expression in PCa group was significantly higher than that in the BPH group(P=0.000).The PCA3 mRNA expression in PCa group was significantly higher than that in the BPH group(P=0.009).The combination of both markers remarkably increased the sensitivity from 47.2%(PCA3 test alone) and 56.6%(T1E4 test alone) to 81.1%.The diagnostic efficacies increased by 33.9% and 24.5%,respectively.Conclusion T1E4 mRNA can be detected in the urine of the prostate cancer patients.The two makers can improve the diagnosis prostates cancer and may potentially be used in the early diagnosis of prostate cancer.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?