Clinical Efficacy Comparison of Lapararoscopic Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy and Radical Abdominal Hysterectomy for the Treatment of Gynecologic Malignancies:a Meta-Analysis

XU Wei,TENG Yincheng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-6946.2013.02.012

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of lapararoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy(LARVH) and radical abdominal hysterectomy(RAH) for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies by meta-analysis.Methods:Electronic searches of the Cochrane Libaray,PubMed,Ovid,EMBASE,CNKI,Wanfang Databases,VIP Full-text Databases and CBMdisc Databases,supplemented by manual searches.Retrieval time as of June 2012,the studies included in the references of eligible studies were additionally searched randomized controlled trials(RCTs) or well-designed retrospective controlled clinical trails(CCTs) with the clinical efficacy of LARVH and RAH.All the data were extracted in the same way as Cochrane system analysis.Meta-analysis were performed by two reviewers independently.Results:Seven RCTs and eleven CCTs met all inclusion criteria,with a toal of 4046 patients,in which 2280 patients were in LARVH group,1766 patients were in RAH group.The meta-analysis showed that:Compared with RAH group,the blood loss of LARVH group was less(MD=-186.00,95%CI -292.48～-79.52,P=0.0006),the hospital days was shorter(MD=-3.37,95%CI -4.23～-2.50,P=0.0000),and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower(RR=0.60,95%CI 0.46～0.79,P=0.0003);however,the incidence of intraoperative complications was higher(RR=1.45,95%CI 1.15～1.82,P=0.0010).There were no significant differences between the two groups in operative time,number of lymph node biopsy and the overall recurrence rate(P>0.01 ).Conclusions:Using LARVH in treating gynecologic malignancies has certain advantages in reducing hospitalization time,surgical blood loss and postoperative complications than RAH treatment,but it should be noted about reducing the incidence of intraoperative complications.