Contending Ideas on China's Non-Alliance Strategy
Liu Ruonan,Liu Feng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pox003
2017-01-01
The Chinese Journal of International Politics
Abstract:As China's rise continues to shape its role in international affairs, Chinese international relations scholars are engaging in a lively debate about the country's grand strategy, particularly surrounding whether or not China should abandon the non-alliance strategy it has adopted since the early 1980s. Some scholars contend that a non-alliance strategy cannot safeguard China's national interests in the face of the United States' security alliance network throughout East Asia, and that without allies China's rise will be contained by the US. Pro-alliance scholars, therefore, are especially favourable towards a formal alliance with Russia. However, orthodox scholars in favour of supporting the official position of non-alliance argue that a formal alliance deviates from the fundamental principles of independence and self-reliance that have historically guided China's foreign policy. Moreover, a number of alternative strategies have been proposed to replace or complement the non-alliance strategy, among which are quasi-alliances, coalitions, and strategic partnerships. In practice, whether or not China forms alliances with other powers and neighbouring states depends on its self-defined role within the current international system, as well as its perception of external security threats. Considering both the external and internal constraints it faces, China is highly likely to maintain the non-alliance stance while pursuing other desirable approaches to making friends and partners.