Abstract:Objective:To compare the advantages and disadvantages of posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).Methods:A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients who underwent surgical treatment for lumbar spondylolisthesis from June 2016 to June 2018. These patients include 33 males and 82 females, ranging in age from 41 to 72 years, with a mean of (57±7) years. 56 cases (posterior interbody fusion group) were treated by intermuscular approach and 59 cases (oblique lateral interbody fusion group) were treated by oblique lateral approach and posterior pedicle screw fixation. The operative time, intraoperative blood loss, imaging results, clinical results and complications were compared between the two groups.Results:All patients were followed up with an average of (27±3) months (range from 12 to 48 months). The operative time and intraoperative blood loss of oblique lateral interbody fusion group were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (P<0.05). There was no incision infection and nerve injury were observed in two groups. Besides, the VAS score at 72 h after surgery of oblique lateral interbody fusion group (1.10±0.08) were significantly less than posterior interbody fusion group (1.51±0.15). According to the analysis of variance with repeated measures design, the difference between the posterior group and the oblique lateral fusion group was statistically significant in terms of lumbar lordosis angle and spondylolisthesis rate at postoperation and the last follow-up (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between different groups in spondylolisthesis angle, sacral inclination angle and intervertebral space height. Both the two groups showed significant improvement in ODI during the final follow-up (P<0.05), but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The incidence of complications in the posterior fusion group was significantly higher than in the oblique lateral fusion group (P<0.05). The fusion rate of posterior interbody fusion group was 96.4% and 94.9% in oblique lateral interbody fusion group, while the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05). During the follow-up, loosening, displacement, breakage of pedicle screw, displacement of intervertebral cages or obvious degeneration of adjacent segments were not observed.Conclusions:The posterior interbody fusion by intermuscular approach and the oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation take well clinical results for treating lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ ). Oblique lateral interbody fusion combined with posterior pedicle screw fixation through intermuscular approach takes advantages of quick operation, less trauma, less bleeding, high safety, quick recovery and no interference to spinal canal, which can be a good choice for treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis (degree Ⅰ-Ⅱ).

Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with Pedicle Screw System and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis with Selective Segmental Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Spinal Fusion

Comparative study of oblique lateral approach and posterior fusion in the treatment of grade Ⅰ-Ⅱ lumbar spondylolisthesis

GSS pedicle screw system and interbody autogenous iliac bone graft fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis

Treatment of vertebrae spondylolisthesis with pedicle screw system

Treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis with posterior decompression,spinal fusion and pedicle screws instrumentation

[Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with AF Device Fixation System and PROSPACE Interbody Fusion Cage].

Surgery strategy for grades Ⅲ and Ⅳ spondylolisthesis in adults

Comparison of Effect of Posterior Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Posterolateral Fusion or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

Treatment of Isthmic Spondylolisthesis by Posterior Pedicle Screw Joint Combined with Cage Fusion

The Study on the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

A Comparative Study of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

[Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion].

PEEK Cages in Spondylolisthesis with Pedicle Screw System and Posterior Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion

Comparative study of three surgical procedures of lumbar interbody fusion for adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis

Efficacy of One-Stage Posterior-Anterior Approach for Treatment of Severe Thoracolumbar Fractures

Clinical Study of Posterior Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

The Treatment of Lumbar Spondyolisthesis with Interverterbral Theaded Fusion Cage (TFC) and Pedicle Screw Reduction and Fixation System

[Posterior Interbody Fusion Versus Improved Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Segmental Spinal Fixation for Aged Spondylolisthesis with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis].

Posterior pedicle screw system and interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative scoliosis

Posterior pedicle screw fixation and intervertebral fusion for recurrent lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion