Amine‐containing tertiary phosphine‐substituted diiron ethanedithioate (edt) complexes Fe 2 ( μ ‐edt)(CO) 6‐n L n ( n = 1, 2): Synthesis, protonation, and electrochemical properties
Jian‐Rong Li,Meng‐Yuan Hu,Shuang Lü,Xiao‐Li Gu,Xing‐Bin Jing,Pei‐Hua Zhao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aoc.5929
IF: 3.9
2020-07-07
Applied Organometallic Chemistry
Abstract:<p>As diiron subsite models of [FeFe]‐hydrogenases for catalytic proton reduction to hydrogen (H<sub>2</sub>), a new series of the phosphine‐substituted diiron ethanedithiolate complexes Fe<sub>2</sub>(<i>μ</i>‐edt)(CO)<sub>6‐n</sub>L<sub>n</sub> (<i>n </i> = 1, 2) were prepared from the variable substitutions of all‐CO precursor Fe<sub>2</sub>(<i>μ</i>‐edt)(CO)<sub>6</sub> (<b>A </b>) and tertiary phosphines (L1‐L4) under different reaction conditions. While the Me<sub>3</sub>NO‐assisted substitutions of <b>A </b> and one equiv. ligands L1‐L4 [L = Ph<sub>2</sub>P(CH<sub>2</sub>NHBu<sup><i>t </i></sup>), Ph<sub>2</sub>P(CH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>NH<sub>2</sub>), Ph<sub>2</sub>P(NHBu<sup><i>t </i></sup>), and Ph<sub>2</sub>P(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>Me‐<i>p </i>)] produced the monosubstituted complexes Fe<sub>2</sub>(<i>μ</i>‐edt)(CO)<sub>5</sub>L (<b>1 </b>–<b>4 </b>) in good yields, the refluxing xylene solution of <b>A </b> and two equiv. ligand L1 prepared complex Fe<sub>2</sub>(<i>μ</i>‐edt)(CO)<sub>5</sub>{<i>κ</i><sup><i>1 </i></sup>‐Ph<sub>2</sub>P(CH<sub>2</sub>NHBu<sup><i>t </i></sup>)} (<b>1 </b>) in low yield. Meanwhile, the UV‐irradiated toluene solution of <b>A </b> and two equiv. ligand L3 resulted in the rare formation of the disubstituted complex Fe<sub>2</sub>(<i>μ</i>‐edt)(CO)<sub>4</sub>{<i>κ</i><sup><i>1 </i></sup><i>, κ</i><sup><i>1 </i></sup>‐(Ph<sub>2</sub>PNHBu<sup><i>t </i></sup>)<sub>2</sub>} (<b>5 </b>) in low yield, whereas the Me<sub>3</sub>NO‐assisted substitution of <b>A </b> and two equiv. ligand L4 afforded the disubstituted complex Fe<sub>2</sub>(<i>μ</i>‐edt)(CO)<sub>4</sub>{<i>κ</i><sup><i>1 </i></sup><i>, κ</i><sup><i>1 </i></sup>‐(Ph<sub>2</sub>PC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>Me‐<i>p </i>)<sub>2</sub>} (<b>6 </b>) in good yield. All the model complexes <b>1 </b>–<b>6 </b> have been characterized by elemental analysis, FT‐IR, NMR spectroscopy, and particularly for <b>1 </b>, <b>3 </b>, <b>5 </b> by X‐ray crystallography. Further, the protonations of complexes <b>1 </b>–<b>4 </b> are studied and compared with excess acetic acid (HOAc) and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) by using FT‐IR and NMR techniques. Additionally, the electrochemical and electrocatalytic properties of model complexes <b>1 </b>–<b>6 </b> are investigated and compared by cyclic voltammetry (CV), suggesting that they are electrocatalytically active for proton reduction to H<sub>2</sub> in the presence of HOAc.</p>
chemistry, inorganic & nuclear, applied