The Difference of Allergic Reactions Compared between BN Rats and Wistar Rats on Oral Exposure to Ovalbumin
N. Sun,C. Zhou,Q.K. Pu,J. Wang,H.L. Che
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2011.12.216
IF: 14.29
2012-01-01
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Abstract:RationaleThere is currently no validated animal model for evaluating the allergenic potential of food proteins. This study aimed to investigate the difference of allergic reactions between BN rats and Wistar rats on oral exposure to ovalbumin by studying immune responses and clinical manifestation.MethodsFemale BN and Wistar rats were orally exposed to OVA at Days 1, 14, 15-42. Sera and plasma were screened for measurement of OVA-specific antibody titers (IgE, IgG and IgG2a) and histamine measured by ELISA. After the induction period, the animals were not exposed to OVA for 1 week. On Day 49, all the OVA-sensitized animals were orally challenged with OVA and observed blood pressure, eletrocardio and histopathologic changes.ResultsOral exposure of BN rats to OVA rendered IgE, IgG and IgG2a antibody responses which were generally of higher levels than those observed in Wistar rats(P<0.05). However, plasma histamine level in Wistar rats was significantly higher when compared to BN rats(P<0.05). The Wistar rat elicited more serious clinical manifestation of OVA-induced anaphylaxis. In addition, histopathologic changes detected in the BN rat mainly included diffuse steatosis in heart tissues and eosinophil infiltration in lung tissues, while the Wistar rat showed steatosis in heart and liver tissues, macrophage proliferation in spleen tissues, slight interstitial pneumonia and tubulointerstitial nephritis.ConclusionsOVA-sensitized BN and Wistar rats showed different immune responses and clinical manifestation, which suggested that the two rat strains may differ in the immunologic mechanism of allergy and there is no correlation between immune responses and the severity of clinical symptoms. RationaleThere is currently no validated animal model for evaluating the allergenic potential of food proteins. This study aimed to investigate the difference of allergic reactions between BN rats and Wistar rats on oral exposure to ovalbumin by studying immune responses and clinical manifestation. There is currently no validated animal model for evaluating the allergenic potential of food proteins. This study aimed to investigate the difference of allergic reactions between BN rats and Wistar rats on oral exposure to ovalbumin by studying immune responses and clinical manifestation. MethodsFemale BN and Wistar rats were orally exposed to OVA at Days 1, 14, 15-42. Sera and plasma were screened for measurement of OVA-specific antibody titers (IgE, IgG and IgG2a) and histamine measured by ELISA. After the induction period, the animals were not exposed to OVA for 1 week. On Day 49, all the OVA-sensitized animals were orally challenged with OVA and observed blood pressure, eletrocardio and histopathologic changes. Female BN and Wistar rats were orally exposed to OVA at Days 1, 14, 15-42. Sera and plasma were screened for measurement of OVA-specific antibody titers (IgE, IgG and IgG2a) and histamine measured by ELISA. After the induction period, the animals were not exposed to OVA for 1 week. On Day 49, all the OVA-sensitized animals were orally challenged with OVA and observed blood pressure, eletrocardio and histopathologic changes. ResultsOral exposure of BN rats to OVA rendered IgE, IgG and IgG2a antibody responses which were generally of higher levels than those observed in Wistar rats(P<0.05). However, plasma histamine level in Wistar rats was significantly higher when compared to BN rats(P<0.05). The Wistar rat elicited more serious clinical manifestation of OVA-induced anaphylaxis. In addition, histopathologic changes detected in the BN rat mainly included diffuse steatosis in heart tissues and eosinophil infiltration in lung tissues, while the Wistar rat showed steatosis in heart and liver tissues, macrophage proliferation in spleen tissues, slight interstitial pneumonia and tubulointerstitial nephritis. Oral exposure of BN rats to OVA rendered IgE, IgG and IgG2a antibody responses which were generally of higher levels than those observed in Wistar rats(P<0.05). However, plasma histamine level in Wistar rats was significantly higher when compared to BN rats(P<0.05). The Wistar rat elicited more serious clinical manifestation of OVA-induced anaphylaxis. In addition, histopathologic changes detected in the BN rat mainly included diffuse steatosis in heart tissues and eosinophil infiltration in lung tissues, while the Wistar rat showed steatosis in heart and liver tissues, macrophage proliferation in spleen tissues, slight interstitial pneumonia and tubulointerstitial nephritis. ConclusionsOVA-sensitized BN and Wistar rats showed different immune responses and clinical manifestation, which suggested that the two rat strains may differ in the immunologic mechanism of allergy and there is no correlation between immune responses and the severity of clinical symptoms. OVA-sensitized BN and Wistar rats showed different immune responses and clinical manifestation, which suggested that the two rat strains may differ in the immunologic mechanism of allergy and there is no correlation between immune responses and the severity of clinical symptoms.