Abstract:Data encryption is a critical aspect of modern information security, and understanding the approaches taken by different regions is vital for a comprehensive analysis. In the United States and Europe, data encryption methods vary in implementation, legal frameworks, and overall priorities. In the United States, encryption methods are primarily governed by a combination of federal laws and industry standards. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) plays a central role in recommending cryptographic standards, while the Department of Commerce oversees export controls on encryption technology. The focus in the U.S. is on balancing national security needs with individual privacy rights. The tension between law enforcement's desire for access to encrypted data for criminal investigations and the right to privacy has sparked debates and legal battles. On the other hand, Europe has taken a more privacy-centric approach to data protection. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a cornerstone in the European Union's efforts to safeguard individual privacy rights. GDPR mandates the use of encryption to protect personal data, and failure to implement adequate measures can result in hefty fines. European countries also emphasize the importance of end-to-end encryption in communication services to ensure confidentiality. Both regions prioritize encryption, but their approaches reflect different values and legal philosophies. The U.S. tends to navigate a delicate balance between national security and individual rights, while Europe places a stronger emphasis on the protection of personal data as a fundamental right. In terms of technological implementation, the encryption algorithms adopted in both regions are often aligned with global standards. Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is widely accepted and implemented in various sectors. However, the choice of key management and the level of regulatory oversight differ, contributing to the nuanced landscape of data protection. In conclusion, a comparative review of data encryption methods in the USA and Europe reveals the complex interplay between security, privacy, and legal frameworks. Understanding these differences is crucial for multinational organizations and individuals navigating the intricate landscape of global data protection. Keywords: Data, Encryption, USA, Europe, Review.

The Review of European Union Information Security Law Frame

A Sociosemiotic Exploration of Personal Information Legislation in the United States and China

Analysis on the Legislation of Our Country Security

Analysis on the Development Trend of EU Data Protection Legislation Reform

Study on County-level e-Government Security Management

A Brief Analysis on the Information Security Policy of the USA

A Comparative Analysis of Personal Data Protection Regulations Between the EU and China

An Analysis on Legal Concept of Information Security Law of China

THE CURRENT SITUATION AND THE RECENT ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SECURITY

Comparison of Security Frameworks for Governmental Clouds between United States and European Union

Analysis and Enlightenment of US Cybersecurity Information Sharing Mechanism

Analysis and Enlightenment of the Evolution of the US Critical Infrastructure Information Security Monitoring and Warning Mechanism

The Legislation Conception of Chinese Network Information Security Emergency Response

Research On Personal Information Protection Law

On the Principal Value and Effect and Mission of Information Security Law in China

The analysis and inspiration of information security management in U.S.universities

The main models of cross-border data transmission regimes: EU, USA and China

RESEARCH AND IMPLEMENTATION OF MODEL OF INFORMATION SECURITY EVALUATION

Analysis framework of network security situational awareness and comparison of implementation methods

A COMPARATIVE REVIEW OF DATA ENCRYPTION METHODS IN THE USA AND EUROPE

A Review of the EU's legal Systems Concerning Animal-Derived Foods