Abstract:Two varieties of Bt transgenic rice,Huachi B6 and TT51 with their correspondingparents and distant hybridization varieties,respectively,were used to determine expression of Bt gene in plants and its residue in rhizosphere soil under field condition,as well as dynamic changes of Bt protein after returningBt rice straw into field.Results showed that,significant differences in expression of Bt protein were observed in different parts of Huachi B6 plants duringdifferent breedingstages(P<0.05),generally followingthe order of seed filling>heading>maturing>flourish tillering,which was similar to the expression in TT51,while no obvious differences were found in Bt protein from TT51 duringdifferent breedingstages(P>0.05).Furthermore,expression of Bt protein in both of TT51 and Huachi B6 kept to the order of spike>shoot>>root duringall the growth.Totally,its expression in TT51 was significantly lower than that in Huachi B6.The levels of expression in spike,shoot and root of Huachi B6 were 10.75-19.76μg/g FW,8.74-14.49μg/g FW and 2.18-5.41μg/g FW,respectively.The correspondingin TT51 were 3.38-5.27μg/g FW,2.27-2.86μg/g FW and 0.76-1.15μg/g FW,respectively.Duringthe whole period,the Bt protein expressed via roots of Bt transgenic rice(TT51 and Huachi B6) was lower than detection limit of 0.25ng/g FW in rhizosphere soil,which can not cause serious accumulation of Bt protein in soil.Therefore,it seemed that environmental risk may not be caused by Bt protein in agroecosystem.In addition,during98-128 d after returningrice straw of Huachi B6 into field,Cry1Ab protein degraded more rapidly and followed a lagstage.Till 195 d,the content kept at the level of 0.35ng/g FW in soil.For TT51,during98-195 d,Cry1Ab/Cry1Ac fusion protein kept a level of 0.35-0.60ng/g FW,which degraded more slowly.By fresh weight,no significant differences were found in two varieties of Bt transgenic rice,their correspondingparents and distant hybridization varieties TT51 grows much better than Huachi B6.

Impact of transgenic rice with a cry1Ab gene on parasitoid subcommunity structure and the dominant population dynamics of parasitoid wasps in rice paddy

Assessing the effects of Cry1C rice and Cry2A rice to Pseudogonatopus flavifemur , a parasitoid of rice planthoppers

CrylAb Rice Does Not Impact Biological Characters and Functional Response of Cyrtorhinus Lividipennis Preying on Nilaparvata Lugens Eggs

Multi-generation effect of Bt rice with cry1C and cry2A on survival, development and reproduction of non-target pest Sogatella furcifera (Horváth)

Impact of transgenic cry1Ab japonica rice on the arthropod community of rice paddies in China

Effect of soil planted with Bt rice on the development and enzyme activities of Eisenia foetida

Ecological Responses of Brown Planthopper,nilaparvata Lugens,to Triazophos and Deltamethrin on Transgenic Bt Rice Lines and Their Non-Bt Parental Rice

Impacts Of Nitrogen Fertilizer On Major Insect Pests And Their Predators In Transgenic Bt Rice Lines T2a-1 And T1c-19

Effectiveness in the Field of Bt Rice Lines Against Target Pests under Various Cultural Regimes

EXPRESSION OF BT INSECTICIDAL PROTEIN IN BT RICE AND ITS RESIDUES IN SOIL AFTER RETURNING RICE STRAW TO FIELD

Effects of Bt Rice with Cry1c and Cry2a on the Ecological Generation Fitness of Rice Brown Planthoppers (nilaparvata Lugens ) and Whitebacked Planthoppers (sogatella Furcifera)at Various Nitrogen Rates

Using Resistant Prey Demonstrates That Bt Plants Producing Cry1Ac, Cry2Ab, and Cry1F Have No Negative Effects on Geocoris Punctipes and Orius Insidiosus.

Bt Cotton Producing Cry1Ac and Cry2Ab Does Not Harm Two Parasitoids, Cotesia Marginiventris and Copidosoma Floridanum

[Effects of Bacillus Thuringiensis Transgenic Rice and Chemical Insecticides on Arthropod Communities in Paddy-Fields].

Impacts of transgenic cry1Ab rice on non-target planthoppers and their main predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis (Hemiptera: Miridae)—A case study of the compatibility of Bt rice with biological control

No direct effects of two transgenic Bt rice lines, T1C-19 and T2A-1, on the arthropod communities.

Effects of Bt Transgenic Rice on Population Dynamics of Main Non-Target Insect Pests and Dominant Spider Species in Rice Paddies

Arthropod Abundance and Diversity in Bt and Non-Bt Rice Fields.

Transgenic Cry1Ab Rice Does Not Impact Ecological Fitness and Predation of a Generalist Spider.

The New Transgeniccry1Ab/vip3HRice Poses No Unexpected Ecological Risks to Arthropod Communities in Rice Agroecosystems

Impact of Six Transgenic Bacillus Thuringiensis Rice Lines on Four Nontarget Thrips Species Attacking Rice Panicles in the Paddy Field.