Abstract:Culture is an all-pervading construct of human existence but its conceptualization is contested. As such, it is problematic to define or measure culture as different paradigms adopt radically different approaches. Emic approaches are, essentially, inward-looking and, via a constructivist paradigm, assert that a culture can be investigated validly only from that culture’s own perspective (idiographic). Etic approaches are concerned with an outside view, especially for cross-cultural investigations, and so tend to adopt a positivist perspective using surveys, models and dimensions (nomothetic). With increasing acceptance of varying conceptualizations, multiple methodologies and methods of research, founded on alternative philosophical stances, differing approaches to researching culture are pursued. However, several important issues of debate remain and are addressed, especially surrounding the seminal work of Geert Hofstede. Further concerns relate to levels of analyses (notably, the ecological fallacy and its reverse), scales of measurement for data collection and analysis, and their combination into indices. How people adapt to and accommodate different cultures is addressed, including structuring of organizational relationships (alliances, etc.) and the enduring debate over whether culture can be managed and the likely consequences of cultural management endeavours. Thus, the approach of positive criticism is adopted in this review of theory and literature to address the main issues in both the topic of culture and its philosophical underpinnings, and of how research methodologies and methods have been used in researching culture. Aspects of good practice and of less good practice are identified throughout to assist researchers and to stimulate further rigorous research into culture in construction. Primary findings emphasize the imperative of coherent and consistent uses of models and levels of analysis, care and rigour in use of scales and attention to the impacts of language and culture on data from respondents.

Conceptual Foundations of Cultural Management Research

From cultural differences to cultural globalization: towards a new research agenda in cross-cultural management studies

Cross-Cultural Management Studies: State of the Field in the Four Research Paradigms*

Chinese Context and Chinese Management Research: Integrative Perspective of Transition Dimension and Culture Dimension

Cross-cultural management research: Topics, paradigms, and methods—A journal-based longitudinal analysis between 2001 and 2018

Use and misuse of the concept of culture

Learning By Doing: Emerging Paths Of Chinese Management Research

Chinese Context and Theoretical Contributions to Management and Organization Research: A Three-decade Review

Critical Cross-Cultural Management: Outline and Emerging Contributions

Cultural Research in the Production and Operations Management Field

The Culture of Economic Life of Society: Essence, Basic Values, Management

The legacy of Geert Hofstede

CONCEPTUAL MANAGEMENT: COGNITIVE PROCESSES, COGNITIVE STRUCTURES, COGNITIVE STYLE

Cross-Cultural Management Revisited

Culture, an excuse?—A critical analysis of essentialist assumptions in cross-cultural management research and practice

The cultural dimensions in supply chain management research: a state-of-the-art review and research agenda

The Main Framework of Ancient Chinese Management Thought from the Perspective of Traditional Culture

Management and Building Theory: the Strategies of Research on Chinese Native Management

Studying Chinese culture and conflict: a research agenda

The past, present, and future of customer management

Strategic Leadership Across Cultures: Current Findings and Future Research Directions