Comparison of Clinical Features and Effects of Endovascular Stent-Graft Repair in Elderly and Middle-Aged Patients with Stanford B Aortic Dissections

JING Quanmin,WANG Xiaozeng,HAN Yaling,LUAN Bo,WANG Geng,WANG Bin,MA Yingyan,ZANG Hongyun,LI Fei
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5403.2011.01.016
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical features of the elderly and middle-aged patients who have been diagnosed with Stanford B aortic dissections,and analyze the therapeutic effects of endovascular stent-graft repair in these patients.Methods From May 2002 to July 2008,totally 124 patients with Stanford B aortic dissection underwent endovascular stent-graft repair.The patients were divided into elderly group(≥60 years old,n=39) and middle-aged group(60 years old,n=85).Follow-up visit ranged from 1 to 78 months,mean(25.7±17.3) months.The clinical data of the patients were collected and analyzed.The short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of endovascular stent-graft repair were compared between the two groups.Results Compared with middle-aged patients,elderly patients had higher incidences of coronary artery disease,atypical dissection,and smoking,while lower incidences of obesity and alcohol drinking.Long-term follow-up visit revealed no difference in complications incidence of aortic dissection between the two groups(15.8%vs 10.0%,P=0.36).For patients complicated by coronary heart diseases,who received endovascular stent-graft repair combined with percutaneous coronary intervention,postoperative complications incidences were also not significantly different between the two groups(12.5%vs 10%,P=1.00).Conclusion The risk factors and clinical features of aortic dissection are different between elderly and middle-aged patients.Early intervention of risk factors can decrease aortic dissection incidences.Endovascular stent-graft repair is effective for treatment of Stanford B aortic dissection.The postoperative complications incidence is independent of age.Endovascular stent-graft repair could be the first choice for treatment of aortic dissection both in the elderly and in the uniddle-aged payierds.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?