Abstract:(Cell Stem Cell 4, 16–19; January 9, 2009) In our recent article, we unfortunately misquoted the findings in a recent study by Ying et al., 2008Ying Q.-L. Wray J. Nichols J. Batlle-Morera L. Doble B. Woodgett J. Cohen P. Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.Nature. 2008; 453: 519-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (2530) Google Scholar. When describing previous work using combination of the MEK inhibitor PD0325901 and the GSK3b inhibitor CHIR99021, our statement “Recent studies demonstrated that addition of the FGFR inhibitor PD173074 to the above cocktail is sufficient to maintain mESC pluripotency in the absence of LIF (Ying et al., 2008Ying Q.-L. Wray J. Nichols J. Batlle-Morera L. Doble B. Woodgett J. Cohen P. Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.Nature. 2008; 453: 519-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (2530) Google Scholar).” was not accurate. Ying et al., in fact, used PD0325901 to replace PD1730474 and demonstrated maintenance of mESCs in the absence of LIF with these two factors only. The corrected section reads “Indeed, after serial passages, the growth of putative riPSCs treated with only PD0325901 and CHIR99021 declined, and the culture deteriorated due to the expansion of differentiated cells, although recent studies demonstrated that this combination of inhibitors can be used to maintain mESC self-renewal in the absence of LIF (Ying et al., 2008Ying Q.-L. Wray J. Nichols J. Batlle-Morera L. Doble B. Woodgett J. Cohen P. Smith A. The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.Nature. 2008; 453: 519-523Crossref PubMed Scopus (2530) Google Scholar). Because the TGFβ/Activin A/Nodal signaling cascade is essential to maintain undifferentiated hESCs and EpiSCs, but dispensable for mESC self-renewal, we tested whether the addition of an inhibitor of the type 1 TGFβ receptor, ALK5 (A-83-01), could help stabilize our riPSC cultures.” In addition, we omitted to mention that while our study was under review, Silva et al., 2008Silva J. Barrandon O. Nichols J. Kawaguchi J. Theunissen T.W. Smith A. Promotion of Reprogramming to Ground State Pluripotency by Signal Inhibition.PLoS Biol. 2008; 6: 2237-2247https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060253Crossref Scopus (651) Google Scholar also published the use of these two inhibitors in the generation and propagation of mouse iPSCs. We apologize for any confusion caused. Generation of Rat and Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells by Combining Genetic Reprogramming and Chemical InhibitorsLi et al.Cell Stem CellDecember 18, 2008In BriefConventional mouse and human embryonic stem cells (ESCs) can be typically derived by in vitro culture of blastocysts (Martin, 1981; Thomson et al., 1998), and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) can be generated by reprogramming somatic cells using defined genetic transduction methods (Takahashi et al., 2007; Takahashi and Yamanaka, 2006; Yu et al., 2007). In both cases, different signaling pathways appear to regulate pluripotency with different characteristics in the two species. However, while rat ESC-like cells have been established based on certain traits (Demers et al., 2007; Ruhnke et al., 2003; Schulze et al., 2006; Ueda et al., 2008), to date, these lines fall short of exhibiting true pluripotency (e.g., fail to form teratoma or no/little contribution to chimerism) and thus cannot be considered authentic rat ESCs. Full-Text PDF Open Archive

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines from Tibetan Miniature Pig

Generation of Pig-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells with a Drug-Inducible System

Generation of pig induced pluripotent stem cells using an extended pluripotent stem cell culture system

Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Using Recombinant Proteins.

Generation of chimeric piglets by injection of embryonic germ cells from inbred Wuzhishan miniature pigs into blastocysts

Generation of porcine-induced pluripotent stem cells by using OCT4 and KLF4 porcine factors

Generation of stable integration‐free pig induced pluripotent stem cells under chemically defined culture condition

Generation of Rat and Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells by Combining Genetic Reprogramming and Chemical Inhibitors

Generation and characterization of stable pig pregastrulation epiblast stem cell lines

The progress of induced pluripotent stem cells derived from pigs: a mini review of recent advances

Reprogramming of Sheep Fibroblasts into Pluripotency under a Drug-Inducible Expression of Mouse-Derived Defined Factors

Reactivation of Endogenous Genes and Epigenetic Remodeling Are Barriers for Generating Transgene-Free Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Pig

Generation of Sheep Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells With Defined DOX-Inducible Transcription Factors via piggyBac Transposition

Generation of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Absence of Exogenous Sox2

Efficient derivation of transgene-free porcine induced pluripotent stem cells enables in vitro modeling of species-specific developmental timing

Establishment of porcine and human expanded potential stem cells

Non-viral Induction of Transgene-free iPSCs from Somatic Fibroblasts of Multiple Mammalian Species

The Application Prospect of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Pig Transgenic Research

Production of Mice Using Ips Cells and Tetraploid Complementation.

Progress in the Research of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from New Species

Generation of Novel Rat and Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by Reprogramming and Chemical Approaches