Abstract:<p>This paper examines whether strategic corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures are value relevant for investors and analysts in the context of China. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from One Belt One Road (OBOR) theme indices, we construct a rating system of strategic CSR disclosures including five dimensions and 20 indicators and perform a principal component analysis and a non‐hierarchical cluster analysis to group sample firms. We find that the market has a positive reaction to strategic CSR disclosures, but the market fails to perceive whether such disclosures are credible. We also find that the number of analysts following a firm is positively associated with its strategic CSR disclosures, and the positive association between strategic CSR disclosures and analysts following is less pronounced for firms with lower credibility. Additional analyses demonstrate that the higher the strategic CSR disclosure quality the more the positive market reaction and that the higher the strategic CSR disclosure quality the more the numbers of analysts following, but this positive association between disclosure quality and analysts following is discounted by a firm's lower credibility. Additional analyses further confirm that the CSR disclosure mandate has a negative moderating effect on investors' and analysts' positive reactions to strategic CSR disclosures. We do not find convincing evidence that the ownership of foreign institutional investors (QFII) has a moderating effect on investors' and analysts' reactions to strategic CSR disclosures. Finally, our extended analyses reveal that strategic CSR disclosures have a positive effect on firm performance with a complementary mediation of innovation.</p>

The Reliability of Rating Agency Information,Trading Strategy,and Resource Allocation

Valuation of Stock Ratings in China Securities Market

Are Underwriter Analysts' Recommendations Reliable?Evidence and Implications from China

Do investors and analysts value strategic corporate social responsibility disclosures? Evidence from China

Does CSR Information Disclosure Improve Investment Efficiency? The Moderating Role of Analyst Attention

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Quality and Firms' Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Government Guarantee, Information Acquisition and Credit Rating Informativeness: Theory and Evidence from China

The real value of China’s stock market

Information transparency and corporate performance - Evidence from China's multi-tiered capital market system

Investor Relations And The Analysts' Forecasts: Empirical Evidence From China

Ownership Structure, Institutional Environment, and the Economic Consequences of Corporate Social Responsibility Information Disclosure: Evidence from Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

The Availability of the Information in Debt Contracts and the Stock Returns:Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies

Public Information Content and Market Information Efficiency: A Comparison Between China and the U.S.

Corporate Social Responsibility, Analyst Focus and Firm Performance

Information Content of Stock Prices and Earnings Management:Evidence from the Chinese Stock Markets

Analysis of ESG information-disclosure strategies considering different risk-appetite investors

Information disclosure as a means of minimizing asymmetric financial reporting: The role of market reaction

Internal Control Report, Quality of Financial Reports and Information Asymmetry: Empirical Evidence from Listed Companies in Shanghai Stock Exchange

Institutional Holding,Institutional Trading,and Stock Market Information Efficiency

A Novel Metric for Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Its Impact on Investment Inefficiency

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Catering to Investor Sentiment in China