Peng's pancreaticogastrostomy-Comparative study on types Ⅰ and Ⅱ procedures(with types Ⅲ and Ⅳ appended)

彭淑牖,王许安,刘颍斌,洪德飞,李江涛,陶峰,谭志健
2009-01-01
Abstract:Objective A comparative study on four types of binding pancreaticogastrostomy(BPG),especially on types Ⅰ and Ⅱ.Methods From May 2008 to May 2009,type I BPG was performed in 21 cases,type Ⅱ in 26 cases.All these cases were carried out with pancreaticoduodenectomy,except for 2 cases with middle segment pancreatectomy(MP).Both these types needed to excise the gastric anterior wall or to open part of the sealed distal gastric stump,and the incision could be used for gastrojejunostomy or closed if the patient received MP.Types Ⅲ and Ⅳ were designed to avoid this procedure,the binding anastomosis was performed behind the stomach posterior wall directly.Results The procedures were successful in all patients,no mortality nor anastomotic leakage occurred.Postoperative complications included: 2 cases of small amount of pleural effusion,1 case of delayed gastric emptying and 2 cases of bile leakage in type Ⅰ BPG;1 case of ascites,2 cases of delayed gastric emptying and 1 case of intra-abdominal bleeding in type Ⅱ BPG;they all cured with conservative treatment.Conclusions BPG has many merits as a new technique: the anastomosis is always placed above the level of the gastric fluid;separate pathways for pancreatic fluid and bile which decreased the hazard of bile leakage;it is suitable for all cases no matter how large is the stump of the pancreas.These four types of BPG have different advantages,they can prevent the incidence of anastomotic leakage effectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?