Abstract:At Rutgers, we approached the Session Track task as an issue of personalization, based on both the behaviors exhibited by the searcher during the course of an information-seeking episode, and a classification of the task that led the person to engage in information-seeking behavior. Our general approach is described in detail at the Web site of our project, and in the papers available there (http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/imls/poodle); in this section, we give an overview of our approach and how we applied results from our previous studies to the TREC 2011 Session Track. Subsequent sections give details of how we actually did things, our results, and our conclusions about the results. The PoODLE project aimed to develop a “personalization assistant”, a client-side application which would monitor the behaviors of a single person on all that person’s computing devices, including, but not limited to informationseeking behaviors, and on the basis of these data, construct a model of the person which would be used either to modify the person’s queries to search engines, and/or to modify the results of the queries returned by the search engines. The most fundamental aspect of the personalization is determination of the task or goal which led the person to engage in information seeking behavior. Other aspects that are important include determination of the person’s degree of knowledge of both the task and of the search topic, and the person’s cognitive abilities. The intention is to make these determinations implicitly, through the evidence of past and current behaviors. To this end, the PoODLE project conducted a series of user studies/experiments, in which we controlled the tasks in which the participants were engaged, conducted psychometric tests to judge two cognitive abilities, and elicited, in various ways, estimates of the participants’ knowledge of the tasks and topics of the searches they were asked to perform. In these studies, we logged a large variety of searcher behaviors, ranging from eye-tracking on search engine result pages (SERPs) and content pages, to querying and temporal behaviors of various sorts. The analysis of the data thus collected was aimed at determining associations among the different behaviors (our dependent variables) and the task, knowledge and cognitive abilities information we controlled or elicited (our independent variables), and on the influence of the independent variables and the predictive power of the dependent variables on searcher evaluation of the usefulness of documents with respect to the search task. The end result of our PoODLE studies has been the generation of several models for prediction of document usefulness, some based solely on behavioral evidence during the searching process, and some modified according to

RUC @ INEX 2011 Data-Centric Track.

PKU at INEX 2010 XML Mining Track

Fudan University at TRECVID 2007

PKU-ICST at TRECVID2009: High Level Feature Extraction and Search

PKU at INEX 2011 XML Snippet Track.

QIRM: A quantum interactive retrieval model for session search.

THU TREC2002 Web Track Experiments

PKU_ICST at TRECVID 2018: Instance Search Task.

TREC-10 Web Track Experiments at MSRA.

CSFCube -- A Test Collection of Computer Science Research Articles for Faceted Query by Example

Structured Search Result Differentiation

Rutgers at the TREC 2011 Session Track.

Combining Strategies For Xml Retrieval

PKUTM at TREC 2010 Blog Track.

3D Object Retrieval with Multimodal Views.

Fudan University at TRECVID 2008.

Peking University at the TREC 2006 Terabyte Track

Hybrid Index Structures for Location-Based Web Search

At the web track of TREC 2003

FDU at TREC-10: Filtering, QA, Web and Video Tasks

Differentiating Search Results on Structured Data