A three-year follow-up comparative study for treating hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy with percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation or septal myectomy

PENG Juan,ZOU Yunzeng,KONG Dehong,WANG Yi,QIAN Juying,GE Lei,FAN Bing,WANG Qibing,WANG Chunsheng,SHU Xianhong,GE Junbo
2012-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation(PTSMA) in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy(HOCM) patients,compared with septal myectomy(SM) in long-term.Method:Twenty-five patients underwent PTSMA,while 17 patients underwent SM.The clinical cardiac events and echocardiograph were followed up before the treatment,1 month,1 year,3 years after the treatment.Result:One patient died in hospital after surgeon,and one patient sudden died in 1 month after PTSMA.Two patients had temporary conduction block during PTSMA.Both treatments released symptoms and improved cardiac function.One month after the operation,compared the interventricular septal thickness [surgical group(14.11±1.12)mm vs ablation group(17.68±0.82)mm,P<0.05] and left ventricular outflow tract pressure gradient(LVOTG) [surgical group(22.55±6.49)mm vs ablation group(44.13±5.93)mm,P<0.05],surgical group was significantly less than the ablation group.With the time pass on,the interventricular septal thickness and LVOTG in septal ablation patients decline further.Followed up for 3 years,no significant difference between the two groups.There are trends in LVEF decreasing,left atrial and left ventricular internal diameter increasing,but no significant difference between two groups.Conclusion:PTSMA and SM can effectively relieve symptoms and improve capacity and cardiac function in HOCM patients with long-term survival after treatment.Ablation therapy for the patients with drug refractory is a better choice besides surgeon.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?