Laparoscopy versus open D2 radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer:short-term outcomes of a comparative study

FANG Guo-ji,DU Xiao-hui,NING Ning,XIA Shao-you,MA Bing,YANG Hua-xia,LIU Qing,ZHANG Ding
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2013.01.007
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the short-term rehabilitative outcomes of laparoscopic assisted radical distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Methods The clinical data of 56 cases of laparoscopic assisted radical distal gastrectomy ( LADG ) and 62 cases of open distal gastrectomy ( ODG ) for gastric cancer admitted during the period from Jan 2010 to Dec 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results There was no significant difference between LADG and ODG group in terms of operative time, number of lymph nodes, pathological TNM staging, and length of resection margin. Blood loss was less after LADG ( 120 ± 25 ml VS 165 ± 42 ml , P < 0.05 ). The time of postoperative flatus and postoperative hospital stay was shorter after LADG ( 75 ± 9 h VS 101 ± 12 h , and 8.2 ± 2.5 d VS 10.5 ± 2.9 d , P < 0.05 , respectively ). Conclusions Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer is feasible, safe, minimally invasive, and with comparable short-term rehabilitative outcomes to open surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?