Intervention of two different digestion methods on the expression of surface antigen alpha 6 integrin and transferrin receptor in epidermic cells

Po Liu,Shaohai Qi,Julin Xie,Bing Huang,Bin Shu,Yingbin Xu,TianZeng Li
2005-01-01
Abstract:Aim: To observe the effects of different digestion methods (pure pancreatin and neutral protease matching with pancreatin) on the expression of surface antigen α6 integrin and transferrin receptor CD71 in epidermic cells, so as to choose a suitable digestion method to separate human epidermal stem cells by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) techniques. Methods: Ten human foreskins from routine circumcisions were collected from the out-patient clinic of surgery, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University. The patients aged 14-22 years were all agreed to join the experiment. Each specimen was divided into two parts, and digested with pancreatin and neutral protease matching with pancreatin, respectively, totally 20 portions, including pancreatin group and neutral protease matching with pancreatin group with 10 portions in each group. Those strips in the pancreatin group were digested with 0.25% trypsogen at 4 °C overnight. On the next morning, the cuticular layer was striped off and the epitheial layer was scratched with curved scissors. Primary basal keratinocytes were collected from the cell suspension. Those in the neutral protease matching with pancreatin group were incubated in 2.5 mg dispase per ml at 4 °C. At the following day, cuticle was striped off, and was cut into I mm×1 mm broken bits. Sheet of epidermis were digested for 5 minutes into pancreatin to gain basal lamina of epidermis cells. Cell suspension 300 μL was gained in the two groups, respectively, adding into propichium iodide for accounting the cell viability of death cells with flow cytometer to calculate cell activity. Labeling epidermic cell with anti-α6 integrin mAb G0H3 and mAb MA712 against the human transferrin receptor CD71 for flow cytometric analysis, and others were resuspensed with epidermic cell medium, and moved into 100 mg/L flask coated with collagen IV at a final seeding cell density of 5×104 viable cells per square centimeter. The growth medium was changed every 3 days. The growth situation of cells was observed. Results: Ten human foreskins in patients after routine circumcisions, totally 20 portions of samples that were digested with pancreatin and neutral protease matching with pancreatin, were all involved in the result analysis. 1 Comparison of cell viability of the two groups after digesting in different enzyme: It was higher in the neutral protease matching with pancreatin group than that in the pancreatin group [(86±1.81) %, (82 ±1.48)%,P < 0.01]. 2 Expression of cell antigen in the two groups after digesting in different enzyme: The cells of α6 briCD71dim in the pancreatin group was (8.00±1.69)%; The cells of α6 briCD71bri occupied (36.00±18.03)%; The cells of α6 dim accounted for (40.00±10.08)%. The 3 types of cells in the neutral protease matching with pancreatin group occupied (30.00±8.59), (8.00±1.63), (38.00±8.72)%, in order. Most of the expression of antigen were similar (P > 0.05). 3 Results of cell morphological observation after digesting in different enzyme: Adherence and extension in the pancreatin group were late slightly for 0.5-1.0 hours as compared with the neutral protease matching with pancreatin group. The growth and proliferation during cultured process had insignificant difference, about 7 days approached to confluence and transfer of culture. At the 7th day, volume of epidermic cells was small, and karyoplasms were big, showing fibroblast. In the neutral protease matching with pancreatin group, the cells adhered within 30 minutes, small amount of cell extended. After 60 minutes, exhibited small cell size, cytoplasm outspread, refracting rate decreased. At the 7th day after culture, the volume of epidermic cells was small with a big nuclear and there were no fibroblast. Conclusion: From the angle of effects on expression of superficial antigen, checking rates of α6 briCD71dim, α6 briCD71bri, α6 dim after pancreatin and neutral protease matching with pancreatin digestion are similar generally, so the two digestion methods can be used according to habit. But the neutral protease matching with pancreatin digestion has little effect on the cell viability. It is easy to master the time of digestion. This method has slight effect on cell injury, and is suitable for separating epidermal stem cells by FACS techniques.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?