Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Terazosin, Tamsulosin a nd Finasteride for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

XIONG Ying,YE Lu,REN Yu,LI Yi,SONG Hao,LI Ning-ning,CHU Zheng-zheng,LI You-ping
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-2531.2005.06.005
2005-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of terazosin, tamsulosin and fin asteride for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods We searched the related original studies all over the world , and only included randomized controlled trials (RCT) and quasi-randomized con trolled trials (CCT). MEDLINE (1966Dec. 2004), EMBASE (1984Dec . 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2004) and four Chinese databases were electronically searched and 10 related journals were handsearched . The studies included in the references of eligible studies were additionally searched. Two reviewers independently screened the studies for eligibility, eva luated the quality and extracted the data from the eligible studies, with confir mation by cross-checking. Divergences of opinion were consulted by a third part y. Meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 4.2 software. Results Twelve original studies involving 2 471 participants met inclusion criteria. Compared with terazosin, tamsulosin could improve inter national prostatic symptom score, with WMD 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03 to 1 .46, P=0.04. There was no statistical difference between teraz osin and tamsulosin in improving the average rate of urine flow (WMD 0.23, 95%C I -0.39 to 0.85, P= 0.46), the residual urine volume (WMD 0.82, 95%CI -2.92 to 4.57, P =0.67) and in diminishing the volume of prostate (WMD=2.20, 95%CI -3 .99 to 8.39, P=0.49). There was no statistical difference bet ween finasteride and tamsulosin in improving the international prostatic symptom score (WMD 0.65, 95%CI -0.45 to 1.75, P=0.25) or the max r ate of urine flow (WMD 0.39, 95%CI -0.72 to 1.51, P=0.49). Only two studies compared finasteride with terazosin and had different conclusio ns. Only one study compared finasteride or terazosin with a combination of these drugs suggested that the combination had higher effective power than finasterid e alone but no difference with terazosin alone. Conclusions Although the effectiveness in some aspects is higher in the tamsul osin group, there is not enough evidence to show which one is the best among the se three drugs. The combination of finasteride and terazosin does not show more effectiveness than terazosin alone. This review suggests that tamsulosin alone s hould be used for the treatment of BPH and the combination needs to be identifie d by better evidence. It is important to improve the quality of original studies .
What problem does this paper attempt to address?