Structural stability and structural imitation of (M = Mn, Mo, Nb, Ti, V, Al, Cr, Ni and Si)

H. Chang,N.X. Chen,J.K. Liang,G.H. Rao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2003-00141-4
2003-01-01
Abstract:: The structural stability of La 2 Co 17-x M x (M = Mn, Mo, Nb, Ti, V, Al, Cr, Ni and Si) based on the interatomic potential has been studied. The calculated site preference of the third element M is found to be the 6c site, which is in agreement with the experiments. In the calculations, if the crystal cohesive energy of La 2 Co 16 Mn is taken as the highest one in the crystallization of La 2 Co 17-x M x , the lowest content x of the third element M (M = Mn, Mo, Nb, Ti and V) required to stabilize La 2 Co 17-x M x , is near that found in the experiments. The differences of the cell parameters between the calculated and the experimental values are less than 0.4%. The differences of the atomic parameters for Co (or M) between the calculated and the experimental values are about or even smaller than 1%, and that of La is about 3%. Because the energies of La(Co 1-x Al x ) 13 are lower than those of La 2 (Co 1-x Al x ) 17 , La 2 (Co 1-x Al x ) 17 could not be formed in the experiments. In the calculations, with either a range of deformation of the structure or the reconstruction of the initial structure La 2 Co 17 from LaCo 5 , the same results including the cohesive energy curves and the crystallographic parameters can be retrieved after the action of the interatomic potentials.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?