Abstract:Abstract Brown and Levinson (1987 [1978]) has remained the most seminal and influential starting point for studying cross-cultural and interlinguistic politeness. Yet it has also provoked countervailing arguments (e. g., Ide 1989; 1993; Matsumoto 1989; Gu 1990; Mao 1994), claiming a Western bias in Brown and Levinson's model, particularly in their construal of the concept of ‘face’, in their overemphasis on face-threat and their assumption of individualistic and egalitarian motivations, as opposed to the more group-centred hierarchy-based ethos of Eastern societies. This leads to the question: Is there an East-West divide in politeness? This article presents a pragmatic framework for studying linguistic politeness phenomena in communication: a common principle of politeness (Leech, 1983; 2005) and a Grand Strategy of Politeness (GSP), which is exemplified in common linguistic behaviour patterns in the performance of polite speech acts such as requests, offers, compliments, apologies, thanks, and responses to these. The GSP says simply: In order to be polite, a speaker communicates meanings which place (a) a high value on what relates to the other person (typically the addressee), and (b) a low value on what relates to the speaker. It is clear from many observations that constraint (a) is more powerful than constraint (b). The following hypothesis will be put forward, and supported by evidence from four languages: that the GSP provides a very general explanation for communicative politeness phenomena in Eastern languages such as Chinese, Japanese and Korean, as well as in Western languages such as English. Since politeness deals with scalar phenomena, this is not to deny the importance of quantitative and qualitative differences in the settings of social parameters and linguistic parameters of politeness in such languages. A framework such as the GSP provides the parameters of variation within which such differences can be studied. Hence this article argues in favour of the conclusion that, despite manifest differences, there is no East-West divide in politeness.

Explanation of Speech Differences and Pragmatic Failure in the Eastern and Western Inter-culture Communication Based on "Maxims of Politeness"

Politeness Phenomena In Ancient China: An Analysis Of A Dream Of Red Mansions

A Study of Politeness in Chinese and English Culture and Cross-cultural Pragmatic Failure

A Contrast on the Differences of Politeness Principle in Chinese-English Cross-Cultural Communication

A Pragmatic Study of Chinese and Western Linguistic Politeness

A Study of Pragmatic Failures in Cross-Cultural Communication

Politeness Principle in Cross- Cultural Communication

On Chinese and Western Politeness Principles

A Comparative Study of Politeness Principles in Chinese and Western Culture

A Comparative Approach to Politeness Principle in English and Chinese: Its Implications for Cross-cultural Communication

A Study on the Pragmatic Distinction of Chinese and English Politeness Principle

A Cognitive Study on Politeness Intention Processing and Its Association with Pragmatic Failure in Cross-Cultural Communication

A Comparison Study of Politeness Principle between English and Chinese Language and Cultural Differences

The Comparison of Politeness Strategies in Chinese Culture and in English Speaking Context

A Comparative Analysis of Pragmatics in the Perspective of Intercultural Communication

Politeness: Is there an East-West divide?

A Comparative Study of Politeness Principle in Chinese and English Language and Culture

Differences in the Principle of Politeness in Chinese and Russian Linguistic Cultures

The Relationship between Cooperative Principle and Politeness Principle and its Application in Cross-culture Communication

Analysis of Pragmatic Failure in Cross-Cultural Communication

Misunderstanding in Cross-cultural Communication ——A Comparative Study of Expressions of Politeness in French and Chinese