Abstract:Glutaredoxins are thermo-stable thiol-disulfide oxidoreductases with different cellular functions, especially important in the cellular redox homeostasis. They are first identified as electron donors for ribonucleotide reductases,1 and also involved in a series of essential biosynthetic reactions and regulation in many biological processes as a glutathione-dependent manner.1-3 Glutaredoxins, coupled with NADPH, GSH, and glutathione reductase, consist of the glutaredoxin system, which transfers electrons from NADPH to glutaredoxins via GSH,4 protecting cells from damages caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the course of normal aerobic metabolism or following exposure to radical-generating compounds, especially when the cellular survival mechanisms are unable to cope with the ROS and/or resulted damages.5, 6 Structurally glutaredoxins (Grxs) belong to the Trx-like fold family, characterized with a β-pleated sheet at the center of the molecule surrounded by five helices and a dithiol active site CXXC motif, despite that some members in Grxs are monothiolic.3, 7-11 Many studies have highlighted the key roles played by sulfhydryl groups (SH) in response to oxidative stress, and particularly, the roles of the GSH/Grxs and thioredoxin (Trx) systems in maintaining the cellular redox homeostasis.12-15 To date five glutaredoxins (Grx1-5) have been identified in yeast S. cerevisiae and classified into two subfamilies. Grx1 and Grx2 belong to the dithiol glutaredoxin subfamily with the active site CPYC motif16 and Grx3-5 belong to the monothiol glutaredoxin subfamily with the active site CGFS motif.9 In dithiolic glutaredoxins the N-terminal cysteine commonly has a relatively low pKa and exists as thiolate in solution, which is important to thiol-disulfide exchange reaction.17-20 The thiolate initializes nucleophilic attack on GSH-mixed disulfide to form a Grx-substrate intermediate, which can be reduced by the C-terminal cysteine, causing the formation of disulfide between two cysteines and the releasing of reduced substrate. Although a lot of glutaredoxin structures from E. coli, poxvirus, pig, and human have been reported, yeast Grx1 shares only 37% highest sequence identity with these structures. The crystal structure of GSH bound Grx1-C30S mutant has been reported recently (PDB code 2JAC), however the distance between sulfur atoms of GSH and Cys27 is 2.88 Å, far beyond the normal disulfide bond length.21 The structure of glutathionylated Grx1 in our work has a standard length of disulfide bond and the side-chain orientation of Cys27 is different from that of 2JAC. Moreover comparative structural analyses of the oxidized and glutathionylated Grx1 illustrate the conformational changes of residues at different redox states, whose roles during catalysis are further compared with the homologous structures. The GRX1/YCL035C open reading frame was amplified by PCR, using S. cerevisiae S288c genomic DNA as the template, and cloned into a pET28b-derived plasmid (Novagen). Extra sequence encoding MGHHHHHH was added at the N-terminal. The recombinant protein was overexpressed by using Rosetta (DE3) strain of Escherichia coli induced with 0.2 mM IPTG at 37°C for 5 h when OD600 nm reached 0.6. Pellets were collected by centrifugation at 8000g for 10 min at 4°C and re-suspended in 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and followed by sonication. After centrifugation at 25,000g for 30 min at 4°C, the supernatant was collected and applied to a Ni2+-NTA column (Amersham Biosciences). The target protein was eluted with 300 mM imidazole in 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0, and loaded to a Superdex 75 16/60 column, equilibrated with 200 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. Fractions containing the recombinant Grx1 were pooled, desalted, and concentrated to 10 mg/mL in a final buffer of 20 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.0. Protein concentration was determined by its absorbance at 280 nm with a theoretical molar extinction coefficient of 6085 M−1 cm−1 (http://www.expasy.org). To check the remaining free thiols of different protein samples, 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) assay was performed as previously described.22 Briefly, the protein sample was diluted with the reaction buffer (0.1M sodium phosphate, pH 8.0) to a final volume of 250 μL, and mixed with 50 μL of Ellman's reagent solution (4 mg DTNB in 1 mL of reaction buffer), then incubated at 25°C for 15 min. The absorbance at 412 nm was measured to determine the sulfhydryl content with a molar extinction of 14,150 M−1 cm−1. As a blank control, 250 μL of reaction buffer without protein was used. Crystals of oxidized and glutathionylated Grx1 were grown at 16°C in a hanging drop of 1.0 μL protein sample at 10 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris-HCl, 20 mM NaCl, pH 7.0 with equal volume of reservoir solution. Oxidized Grx1 was crystallized in 12% PEG 20,000 and 0.1M MES (2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid), pH 6.5. Glutathionylated Grx1 was cocrystallized with 20 mM GSH in 20% PEG 4000, 0.1M sodium acetate, pH 5.3, and 0.2M ammonium dihydrogen phosphate. The crystal was transferred to the cryoprotectant of the reservoir solution supplemented with 25% glycerol and flash cooled with liquid nitrogen. The X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K in a liquid nitrogen stream using a Rigaku MM007 X-ray generator (λ = 1.5418 Å) with a MarResearch 345 image-plate detector at School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC, Hefei, China). Data were processed using AUTOMAR 1.4.23 The structure of oxidized form was solved by the molecular replacement method with the program CNS24 using the atomic coordinates of human Grx2 complexed with GSH (PDB code 2FLS) as the search model (36% sequence identity). The structure of glutathionylated Grx1 was solved using the oxidized Grx1 structure as the model. Both structures were fitted and rebuilt with program O25 and refined with REFMAC526 and CNS.24 The overall assessments of model quality were performed using PROCHECK V 3.4.4.27 All figures were prepared with PyMOL.28 According to the results of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry and 5,5′-dithio-bis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) assay, the recombinant Grx1 overexpressed in E. coli was purified in oxidized form without glutathionylation (data not shown). Statistics of Grx1 structures are summarized in Table I. The key residues are highly conserved among all glutaredoxins (see Fig. 1). Similar to its homologues, the overall structure of Grx1 is consistent with the glutaredoxin fold (Trx-like fold), with a core of four mixed β-strands, in which three are antiparallel (β1, β3, β4) with strand β2 parallel to the adjacent β1 [Fig. 2(A)]. The central β-sheet is surrounded by five α-helices, which is similar to crystal structures of pig Grx1 (PDB code 1KTE) and human Grx2 (PDB code 2FLS), while helices α1 and α5 are absent from E. coli Grx1 (PDB code 1EGO) or Grx3 (PDB code 3GRX). Two η-helices are also assigned on each side of strand β2 in Grx1 while the η-helix before strand β2 is missing in E. coli Grx3, human Grx2, and poplar Grx-C1 (PDB code 1Z7R), due to the lack of corresponding residues (see Fig. 1). Sequence multi-alignment of Grx1 and its homologues. The alignment was performed using MultAlin and ESPript (http://prodes.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin).29, 30 The secondary structural elements are identified from structures of S. cerevisiae and poxviral (PDB code: 2HZF) and displayed at the top and bottom of the alignment, respectively. The α-helices, η-helices, β-sheets, and strict β-turns are denoted as, α, η, β and TT, correspondingly. Completely conserved residues are indicated by white lettering on a red background. Residues involved in binding of GSH are labeled with stars below the sequence. (A) Cartoon representation of the overall structure of glutathionylated Grx1. Secondary structures are labeled with the α-helix and η-helix colored in cyan and β-strand in purple. (B) The omit map of glutathionylated Grx1. Contours are drawn at 1.5 σ. (C) Interactions between GSH and Grx1 in glutathionylated Grx1. C atoms in GSH are colored in yellow, while C atoms in Grx1 are colored in palecyan. Other atoms are colored according to atom types, S in gold, O in red, and N in blue. Water molecules are illustrated as red dots. Distances between atoms are labeled in Å. In the structure of glutathionylated Grx1, a GSH molecule forms disulfide bond with Cys27 and the distance between sulfur atoms of GSH and Cys27 is refined to 2.10 Å, as shown in the omit map [Fig. 2(B)]. Surface analyses illustrated a well-defined GSH binding groove in Grx1, similar to other GSH-complexed glutaredoxin structures.31, 32 The groove is composed of residues which are mostly conserved in glutaredoxins, labeled with stars in Figure 1. Comparisons of surface and electrostatic potentials in these structures demonstrate that the groove is specifically GSH-shaped and nearly positively charged, finely complementary to the shape and charge of GSH molecule. This groove does not exist in Trx, DsbA, and PDI, consistent with their lack of GSH-binding capacity.2, 33 Sequence multi-alignment shows this groove mainly consists of two regions, Ile85-Asp89 and Thr74-Pro76, and a patch composing of Lys24 and Gln63, contributing to the recognition and stabilization of the three moieties of GSH molecule. In the first GSH binding region, residues Asn88 and Asp89 form intensive hydrogen bonds with the γ-glutamyl moiety of GSH. Residues Ile85, Gly86, and Gly87 assist in the formation and orientation of helix α4, which is crucial for the proper positioning of Asn88 and Asp89 to stabilize GSH. Comparing with glutathionylated E. coli Grx3 and human Grx1, the conformation of γ-glutamyl moiety of GSH in glutathionylated Grx1 adopts a different conformation with highly favorable interactions of its two carboxyl oxygen atoms and amide nitrogen atom to hydrogen bond with amide nitrogen atoms of Asn88, Asp89 and carboxyl at side chain of Asp89, respectively [Fig. 2(C)]. Contrasted to the oxidized Grx1, the bonded GSH in glutathionylated Grx1 causes the side chain hydroxyl of Tyr29 to move 1.61 Å towards GSH, despite that the oxidized form has inserted with one MES molecule similar to the γ-glutamyl moiety of GSH. The distance between the γ-glutamyl moiety of GSH and side chain of Tyr29 [Fig. 2(C)] is within 6 Å, resulting in very strong hydrophobic interactions34 with GSH. These interactions could be found from other glutathionylated (PDB code 3GRX and 1B4Q) and GSH-bound glutaredoxins (PDB code 2FLS and 2JAC). Furthermore, according to the glutaredoxin active site pattern search in PROSITE (http://www.expasy.org/prosite/), the second X in CXXC motif corresponds to either one of residues of Phe, Tyr, Trp, and His, which addresses the importance of hydrophobic interactions in stabilizing the approaching GSH. The second GSH binding region consists of residues Thr74, Val75, and Pro76. In the glutathionylated Grx1, one of the oxygen atoms of glutamyl moiety in GSH forms two water-mediated hydrogen bonds with the hydroxyl of Thr74 and carbonyl oxygen of Pro76, coupling with the carbonyl oxygen and amide nitrogen of cysteinyl group in GSH-forming hydrogen bonds with amide nitrogen and carbonyl oxygen of Val75 [Fig. 2(C)]. Such hydrogen bond interactions are also found in other GSH complex structures of E. coli Grx1 and Grx3 and human Grx1 and Grx2. Meanwhile, residue Pro76 in yeast Grx1 exists in the cis conformation to introduce a sharp turn at the start of strand β3, which helps Grx1 to adapt the γ-glutamyl moiety of GSH specifically. A recent paper indicates that the γ-linkage between γ-glutamine and cysteine of GSH, which stacks on Pro76, is important in the specificity of GSH to the GSH-shaped groove in E. coli Grx1, demonstrated by the absence of mixed disulfide product between E. coli Grx1 and GSH analog, glutamylcysteinylglycine.35 Residues Lys24 and Gln63 are contributing to binding the glycine moiety of GSH, as observed in other GSH-complexed glutaredoxins.36 The conserved Gln63 forms a hydrogen bond network with the highly conserved Lys24, the carboxylate of glycine moiety of GSH, and the main chain carbonyl oxygen of Arg73 [Fig. 2(C)]. Gln63 in yeast Grx1 is corresponding to Arg58 in poxviral glutaredoxin. Although in poxviral glutaredoxin the electrostatic repulsion will drive both positively charged residues of Lys20 and Arg58 apart, it is proposed that Arg58 could adopt a conformation to make a salt bridge with the carboxylate of glycine moiety in GSH thus avoid the electrostatic conflict with Lys20,37 as Arg67 and Arg40 in solution structures of glutathionylated human Grx131 and E. coli Grx3,32 respectively. In the oxidized yeast Grx1, B-factors of the region Lys24-Tyr26 are almost twice to those of the adjacent residues, which is also observed at corresponding region either in oxidized pig Grx1 or both oxidized and reduced poxviral glutaredoxin. Moreover in structures of glutathionylated yeast Grx1 and human Grx2 (PDB code 2FLS), B-factors in this region decrease to the same level as neighboring residues (data not shown). This phenomenon demonstrates that this region, either in the oxidized form or reduced form, is relatively flexible to be ready for GSH or disulfide substrates binding, which can be also found in solution structures of E. coli Grx1 (PDB code 1EGO, 1EGR, 1GRX, and 1QFN) and Grx3 (PDB code 3GRX). Subsequent to the break of disulfide between Cys27 and Cys30 in glutathionylated Grx1, dramatic conformational rearrangements were found at residues of both Thr25 and Tyr26 [Fig. 3(A)]. The orientation of carbonyl oxygen atom of Thr25 flips reversely, causing main chain C atom to move with a distance of 0.92 Å in glutathionylated Grx1, accompanied by the reorientation of carbonyl oxygen atom of Tyr26. Interestingly the aromatic side chain of Tyr26 is found flipping around towards the active site in the glutathionylated form, causing the side chain hydroxyl of Tyr26 to move 12.22 Å and form one water-mediated hydrogen bond with the carboxylate oxygen atom of glycine moiety in GSH. Residues Thr25 and Tyr26 in Grx1 are corresponding to Tyr21 and Thr22 in poxviral glutaredoxin, respectively. In the reduced poxviral glutaredoxin, the side chain of Tyr21 is packed onto a strongly hydrophobic pocket while solvent-exposed in oxidized state; the main chain oxygen atom of Thr22 moving towards the solvent and its side chain tilted towards the active site, which is similar to Tyr26 in yeast Grx1 [Fig. 3(B)]. We have also soaked the oxidized Grx1 crystal into the reservoir solution containing 20 mM DTT, and determined its structure as an artificial reduced state with the break of disulfide between Cys27 and Cys30. To our surprise, although the side-chain of Tyr26 is fixed in the reduced yeast Grx1 structure as in the oxidized form due to crystal packing, the reorientation of main chain atoms of Thr25 and Tyr26 is completely consistent with the glutathionylated Grx1 and reduced poxviral glutaredoxin. It indicated that the conformation of main chain atoms of Thr25 and Tyr26 is controlled by the disulfide bond between Cys27 and Cys30, whose breakage will trigger the reorientation of Thr25 and Tyr26, followed by flipping of the side chain of Tyr26. (A) Stereoview of conformational changes from Lys24 to His31 in oxidized and glutathionylated Grx1, of which C atom is colored in yellow and palecyan, respectively. Other atoms are colored as Figure 2. (B) Stereoview of structural superposition between glutathionylated Grx1 and reduced poxviral glutaredoxin, with C atom colored in palecyan and green, respectively. Residues in yeast Grx1 are labeled and corresponding residues in poxviral glutaredoxin are label in parentheses. In addition, contrasted to the oxidized Grx1, the side chain of His31 turns around about 120° in glutathionylated Grx1, stacking on the Cys27-Pro28 dipeptide [Fig. 2(A)]. The Nε2 atom in the side chain of His31 forms a hydrogen bond with the carbonyl oxygen atom of Thr25 at a length of 2.69 Å. Such a conformational change has been mentioned in the study of pKa value of N-terminal cysteine in reduced pig glutaredoxin,38 in which Arg26, corresponding to His31 in yeast Grx1, can swing to stack on the CPFC motif and form hydrogen bonds with carbonyl oxygen atoms of Pro20 and Thr21. Although Arg26 cannot contact the nucleophilic cysteine and has only a marginal influence on pKa,39 prior mutation of Arg26 to Val leads to a particularly marked decrease in enzymatic activities.40 Whether His31 has similar influence on the pKa of Cys27 and/or the enzymatic activities still needs further investigation.

Abstract:The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in aerobic organisms can cause oxidative stress which results in significant damages to cell constituents. These damages are believed to be related to a couple of degenerative diseases in human beings.1, 2 To eliminate the damages caused by ROS, cells have developed several defense mechanisms.3 As one of the key members during oxidative stress response, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae Hyr1/YIR037W (formerly termed Gpx3) was reported to be a glutathione-dependent phospholipid peroxidase (PhGpx) that specifically detoxifies phospholipid peroxide.4 Moreover, Hyr1 has been identified to sense and transfer the oxidative signal to the transcription factor Yap1.5 Upon accumulation of H2O2, the Hyr1-Cys36 residue is oxidized to a cysteine sulfenic acid (Cys-SOH)6 and then forms a mixed disulfide bond with Yap1-Cys598. This disulfide bond is further resolved into a Yap1 Cys310-Cys598 intra-molecular disulfide bond, leaving a reduced Hyr1-Cys36 ready for the next cycle of signal sensing. When the oxidative stress is released, thioredoxin Trx2 can turn off this signal transduction pathway by reducing both Hyr1 and Yap1. In vivo experiments also suggested that Hyr1 is more likely an oxidative signal sensor and transducer, instead of a hydroperoxides scavenger.5 Compared to mammalian GPxs, Hyr1 has two distinct features. First, Hyr1 lacks an oligomerization loop corresponding to the tetramer interface of mammalian GPxs (except that human GPx4 is a monomeric enzyme lacking the tetrameric interface).7 Second, Hyr1 has a nonaligned second cysteine (Cys82) analogous to the resolving cysteine in the 2-Cys peroxiredoxins.8 Homology modeling suggests that these two features are important determinants to the thioredoxin specificity, which makes Hyr1 a thioredoxin-dependent peroxidase rather than a glutathione-dependent one as it was previously annotated.9 Here we reported the crystal structure of Hyr1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and activity assay of its active Cys82. Comprehensive structural analyses revealed that the Cys36 thiol adopts an orientation that favors the formation of Cys36-Cys82 intramolecular disulfide bond. The weak electron density of the Cys82-segment (residues 69–86) suggests a high degree of motion of this region, which might act as a mobile lid to control the recognition of substrates or protein partners. Furthermore, the enzymatic assay of wild-type Hyr1 and Cys82Ser mutant confirmed the importance of Cys82, consistent with previous reports.5 The open reading frame of Hyr1/YIR037W gene from Saccharomyces cerevisiae was cloned into a pET28a-derived vector. This construct adds a hexahistidine (6×His) tag to the N-terminus of the recombinant protein, which was overexpressed in E. coli Rosetta (DE3) strain using 2×YT culture medium (5 g of NaCl, 16 g of bactotrypton, and 10 g of yeast extract per liter). The cells were grown at 37°C up to an A600 nm of 0.6. Expression of recombinant Hyr1 was induced at exponential phase with 0.2 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactoside (IPTG) and cell growth continued for another 20 h at 16°C before harvesting. Cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.0, 250 mM NaCl). After 3 min of sonication and centrifugation, the supernatant containing the soluble target protein was collected and loaded to a Ni-NTA column (GE Healthcare) equilibrated with binding buffer (50 mM HEPES pH7.0, 250 mM NaCl). The target protein was eluted with a linear gradient of imidazole from 50 to 500 mM, and further purified by gel filtration in a Superdex 75 column (Amersham Biosciences) equilibrated with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and 250 mM NaCl. The purified protein showed a single band in SDS-PAGE and the integrity was checked by mass spectrometry. The protein sample was concentrated to 1 mg/mL and the solvent-exposed lysines were methylated following the protocol published previously.10 The precipitated protein was removed by centrifugation before purification of the soluble fraction with a desalt column pre-equilibrated in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.0, 50 mM NaCl, and 14 mM β-mercaptoethanol. Fractions containing the target protein were pooled and concentrated to 10 mg/mL. The crystals were grown at 289 K using the hanging drop vapor-diffusion techniques, with the initial condition by mixing 1 μL of the protein sample with equal volume of mother liquor (0.2M ammonium acetate, 0.1M sodium acetate, pH 4.6, 30% polyethylene glycol 4000). Typically, crystals appeared in 10 days. The crystal was transferred to the cryoprotectant of the reservoir solution supplemented with 15% glycerol and flash frozen with liquid nitrogen. The X-ray diffraction data were collected at 100 K in a liquid nitrogen stream using a Rigaku MM007 X-ray generator (λ = 1.5418) with a MarRearch 345 image-plate detector at School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China (USTC, Hefei, China). Data were processed with the Program MOSFLM11 and scaled with SCALA.12 The crystal structure of Hyr1 was solved by the molecular replacement method with the program MOLREP13 using the reduced form of poplar PtGpx5 (PDB code 2P5Q) as the search model. The dataset was severely anisotropic, with diffraction limits of 2.0 Å along the a* and b* directions, but only 2.80 Å along the c* direction. For this reason, the data was truncated along c* at 2.80 Å and scaled with the diffraction anisotropy server (see the Supporting Information table).14 Crystallographic refinement was performed using the program REFMAC5.15 After several rounds of manual rebuilding using the graphics program COOT,16 TLS parameters were analyzed with the TLSMD server and introduced in the refinement.17, 18 The water molecules were then placed into the electron density map, resulting in the final model. The structure was finally refined to 2.02 Å with the Rfactor 22.4% and Rfree 25.7%. The stereochemical quality of the final model was verified using the program PROCHECK.19 The structure factor and coordinate were deposited in the Protein Data Bank under the accession code of 3CMI. The final statistics and refinement parameters were listed in Table I. All figures of protein structure were prepared with PyMol.20 Peroxidase activity was monitored by the spectrometric determination of NADPH consumption at 340 nm following the previous method.5 The reaction was carried out in a buffer containing 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.3 mM NADPH, and 2.68 μM yeast thioredoxin Trx2 and 0.18 μM yeast thioredoxin reductase Trr1. Purified Hyr1 was added to a 200 μL reaction mix to a final concentration of 1.35 μM, and the reaction was started 30 s later by adding H2O2 to 100 μM. The N-terminal 6×His tag and residues 69–86 including the resolving Cys82 can not be located because of weak electron density, suggesting a high degree of structural flexibility of these regions. The overall structure of Hyr1 adopts the typical thioredoxin-like fold,21 consisting of four β-strands clustered as the central β-sheet which is surrounded by three α-helices [Fig. 1(A)]. The crystal structure indicates that Hyr1 is a monomeric protein, which is consistent with our previous gel filtration result.22 Compared to mammalian tetrameric Gpx structures,23 Hyr1 lacks an oligomeration loop that is located at the C-terminus and an extended N-terminal 310 helix. Besides, the characteristic N-terminal β-hairpin in mammalian Gpxs or poplar Gpx5 is not preserved either.23-25 Hydrophobic residues near Cys36 such as Val32, Tyr42, Pro63, and Phe127 are partially exposed to solvent and form a hollow hydrophobic pocket, which suggests a potential role in the substrate binding. It is worth noticing that these residues are well conserved in the Gpx family, but they are shielded from solvent by helix α2 in mammalian Gpx structures and rPtGpx5 (see below for a detailed discussion). A: Cartoon representation of the overall fold of Hyr1, colored and labeled according to the secondary structures. Cys36 thiol was highlighted as sticks and the interrupted points were colored with purple and connected with a gray dashed line. B, C: Superposition of Hyr1 (red) upon rPtGpx5 (cyan) and oPtGpx5 (gray), respectively. The helix α2 of rPtGpx5 and peroxidatic and resolving cysteine of all structures were labeled. D: Hyr1 peroxidase activity assays. Assays were performed separately for three times in the presence of Trx2, Trr1, NADPH, and H2O2, with Hyr1 (filled squares), with Hyr1-Cys82Ser mutant (open triangles), without Hyr1 as a null control (filled circles). Data are expressed as the decrement of OD340 nm against time in minute. The error bars represent the standard deviations. The side chain of Cys36 is pointing toward the exterior of the protein and is solvent-exposed. Homology modeling and biochemical study of Hyr1 has suggested that Gln70 and Trp125 form hydrogen bonds with the Cys36 thiol in the reduced state and play an essential role in modulating the reactivity towards peroxide.6 However, in our structure the thiol of Cys36 is not hydrogen-bonded to any neighboring residues. The side chain of Trp125 is more than 10 Å away from the thiol of Cys36 and Gln70 is not positioned in the structure due to weak electron density. Compared to the mammalian homologue Gpx4 and reduced form of PtGpx5 (rPtGpx5) with sequence identity ranging from 44% to 50%,24, 25 the structure of Hyr1 undergoes large local conformation changes, especially at the loop between helix α1 and strand β1. Taking rPtGpx5 as the reference structure, the beginning of Hyr1 helix α1 undergoes a partial unwinding and rearrangement so that the main chain of Cys36 shift ∼6.0 Å toward the aligned helix α2 of rPtGpx5, with the thiol of Cys36 flipping over by ∼180° to the opposite and becoming more solvent-exposed [Fig. 1(B)]. The missing Cys82-segment corresponds to the rPtGpx5 helix α2, which is just aligned in the position to shield the hydrophobic pocket of Hyr1 from solvent. Superposition of Hyr1 onto the oxidized form of PtGpx5 (oPtGpx5) structure reveals that the Hyr1 Cys36 has a main chain shift of ∼3.7 Å from the oPtGpx5 Cys42, but the thiols of the two equivalent cysteines adopt the same orientation [Fig. 1(C)]. Moreover, oPtGpx5 helix α2 is completely unwound into less-ordered loop with a relatively higher B-factor,24 whereas in our structure this part shows weak electron density because of the high degree of motion. However, no obvious crystallographic evidence supports the presence of Cys36-Cys82 disulfide bond or Cys-SOH intermediate of Cys36 in Hyr1. Considering the lack of any reducing agent throughout purification and crystallization, the present crystal structure of Hyr1 may represent an intermediate state between the reduced and oxidized states, with the active site residues taking the conformations more favorable of forming Cys36-Cys82 disulfide bond. Taken together, the Cys82-segment of Hyr1 may act as a flexible lid covering the substrate binding site. Upon oxidation, it might be moved to facilitate the formation of intra-molecular disulfide bond, and/or the hydrophobic interaction with its substrate or protein partners, such as hydrophobic part of phospholipid peroxide or Yap1.4, 5 The equivalent parts of mammalian tetrameric Gpxs are not reported to show flexibility partially because they are involved in protein dimerization and thus stabilized.9 However, it remains unknown how the substrates or protein partners specifically interact with Hyr1 and what is the actual driven force of this flexible lid. To confirm whether the recombinant Gpx3 has a functional Cys82, we investigated the catalytic properties of Hyr1 and Cys82Ser mutant. In the presence of thioredoxin system (Trx2-Trr1-NADPH), wild-type Hyr1 could consume H2O2 rapidly, while the Cys82Ser mutant totally abolished the activity, indicating the important role of Cys82 in Trx2 specificity [Fig. 1(D)]. In summary, these results and previous reports5 further evidenced our structural analyses of the mobile active site. Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Glutathionylation-Triggered Conformational Changes of Glutaredoxin Grx1 from the Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae

Structural and Biochemical Characterization of Yeast Monothiol Glutaredoxin Grx 6

Structural basis for the different activities of yeast Grx1 and Grx2.

cDNA cloning and expression analysis of glutaredoxin 3 in black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon

Crystal structure of glutathione-dependent phospholipid peroxidase Hyr1 from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Structure-guided activity enhancement and catalytic mechanism of yeast grx8.

Solution structure of Escherichia coli glutaredoxin-2 shows similarity to mammalian glutathione-S-transferases.

Crystal Structure of Yeast Monothiol Glutaredoxin Grx6 in Complex with A Glutathione-Coordinated [2Fe-2S] Cluster

Crystal Structure of Human SH3BGRL Protein: the First Structure of the Human SH3BGR Family Representing a Novel Class of Thioredoxin Fold Proteins

Cloning, Expression, Characterization, and Antioxidant Protection of Glutaredoxin3 from Psychrophilic Bacterium Psychrobacter Sp. ANT206

Regulative Roles of Glutathione Reductase and Four Glutaredoxins in Glutathione Redox, Antioxidant Activity, and Iron Homeostasis of Beauveria Bassiana

Glutaredoxin 1 from Evolutionary Ancient Hydra: Characteristics of the Enzyme and Its Possible Functions in Cell

Structural and functional fine mapping of cysteines in mammalian glutaredoxin reveal their differential oxidation susceptibility

Crystal structure of glutathione reductase Glr1 from the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae

iochemical Insights into the ns of Yeast Grx 3 ng ,

Structural Insight into Poplar Glutaredoxin C1 with A Bridging Iron-Sulfur Cluster at the Active Site

Toward a refined classification of class I dithiol glutaredoxins from poplar: biochemical basis for the definition of two subclasses

N-terminus Deletion Affecting the Preparation of Soluble Cyanobacterial Glutaredoxin in Escherichia Coli.

Expression and oxidative stress tolerance studies of glutaredoxin from cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 in Escherichia coli.

Identification of novel targets of cyanobacterial glutaredoxin.

Structural and Biochemical Insights into the Multiple Functions of Yeast Grx3.