Feeding preferences and morphological variation ofHyalopterus pruni(Geoffroy) (Hemiptera:Aphididae) from different host plants
Xiao-Juan WANG,Jun JING,Jia-Dan CHEN,Kai LI,Yan FANG
2016-01-01
Abstract:Objectives] The peach mealy aphid, Hyalopterus pruniGeoffroy (Hemiptera: Aphididae), is a common agricultural pest that is widely dispersed in China and Europe. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the feeding preferences and morphological variation ofH. pruni collected from peach, plum, and reeds in Shanghai, China.[Methods] The feeding preferences ofH. pruni were determined using the leaf disc test, and morphological variation of specimens collected on 3 different host plants was quantified by principal component analysis, hierarchical cluster analysis and canonical discriminate analysis of 30 morphological characteristics such as body length (BODYL), body width (BODYW), length of antenna segments and length of leg segments.[Results] Aphids had an obvious preference for reeds irrespective of the host plant they were collected on.H. pruni collected on reeds and peach trees preferred peach to plum foliage, but those collected on plum trees displayed no significant preference between peach and plum leaves. Morphological analysis did not detect any significant differences betweenH. pruni feeding on peach and plum foliage (P>0.05). However, those feeding on reeds differed significantly from those feeding on peaches and plums in the length of antennalⅡ (ANTLⅡ), length of processus terminalis antennalⅣ(PTL), basal length of ultimate rostral (URSL) and length of middle tibia (MTL) (P<0.05). In addition, a significant difference was found in FTⅠL betweenH. pruni collected on reeds and those on plum trees (P<0.05). The results of principal component analysis showed that BODYL, HEADW, and antenna and leg length, were the top four principal components, collectively comprising up to 66.206% of the total variance. Among these morphological characteristics, the highest variance was in antenna and leg length. Moreover, cluster and canonical discriminate analysis show thatH. pruni collected on reeds can be objectively separated from those collected on peach and plum trees. Our inability to distinguishH. pruni feeding on peaches and plums may be because these plant species belong to the same family.[Conclusion] There were significant differences in ANTLⅡ, PTL, URSL and MTL betweenH. pruni feeding on graminaceous and rosaceous plant species. Morphological differentiation ofH. pruni may be the result of different nutritional composition and surface characteristics of host plants, however, the specific mechanisms responsible need further exploration.