Clinical Significance of Complement Split Product C4d Deposition in Peritubular Capillaries in Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

柳金顺,谭建明,吴卫真,杨顺良,林忠清,余英豪,郑智勇,曾玲
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1785.2006.04.010
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To explore the significance of peritubular capillary C4d deposition in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of the patients with acute renal allograft rejection.Methods 86 allograft biopsies obtained from 78 kidney transplants were examined by immunohistochemistry on routine paraffin sections using anti-C4d polyclonal antibody. The relationship of C4d and functions, therapies and prognoses of allografts was analyzed. Results There were 32 allograft biopsies with Banff type Ⅰ rejection, 51 with Banff type Ⅱ rejection and 3 with Banff type Ⅲ rejection. Thirty biopsies were positive in C4d deposition. For 28 patients, at least one biopsy exhibited peritubular C4d deposition. There was no significant difference between type Ⅰ and type Ⅱ rejection ( 21.9 % vs 39.2 % , P= 0.101 ). The C4d~ + group had proportionately more patients with pregnant history (P= 0.020 ), more patients with high panel-reactive antibody levels (P= 0.013 ), and more retransplanted patients (P= 0.016 ). Mean serum creatinine was significantly higher in C4d positive patients than in negative patients[( 312.56 ± 196.26 ) μmol/L vs ( 210.97 ± 136.59 ) μmol/L, P= 0.0115 ]. Patients with C4d deposition were more commonly resistant to antirejection therapy with bolus steroids ( 75.0 % vs 28.0 % , P= 0.000 ) and ATG ( 66.7 % vs 12.5 % , P= 0.027 ). More patients with peritubular C4d deposition lost their grafts during the study period (64.3 % vs 90.0 %, P= 0.006 ).Conclusion Acute rejection with C4d deposition were resistant to antirejection therapy with steroids and/or ATG, and associated with inferior graft outcome.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?