Prognostic Impact of Pattern of Mandibular Involvement in Gingivo-Buccal Complex Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Marrow and Mandibular Canal Staging System
Abhishek Mahajan,Navnath Dhone,Richa Vaish,Ankita Singhania,Akshat Malik,Kumar Prabhash,Ankita Ahuja,Nilesh Sable,Pankaj Chaturvedi,Vanita Noronha,Sarbani Gosh Laskar,Ujjwal Agarwal,Shreya Shukla,Gouri Pantvaidya,Prathamesh Pai,Atanu Bhattacharjee,Vijay Patil,Asawari Patil,Munita Bal,Swapnil Rane,Shivakumar Thiagarajan,Anil D' Cruz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.752018
2022-03-03
Abstract:Purpose: To study the pattern of mandibular involvement and its impact on oncologic outcomes in patients with gingivo-buccal complex squamous cell carcinoma (GBC-SCC) and propose a staging system based on the pattern of bone involvement (MMC: Marrow and mandibular canal staging system) and compare its performance with the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC8). Methods: This retrospective observational study included treatment-naïve GBC-SCC patients who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging between January 1, 2012, and March 31, 2016, at a tertiary care cancer center. Patients with T4b disease with high infratemporal fossa involvement, maxillary erosion, and follow-up of less than a year were excluded. The chi-square or Fisher's exact test was used for descriptive analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimate and log-rank test were performed for survival analysis. Multivariate analysis was done using Cox regression analysis after making adjustments for other prognostic factors. p-Value <0.05 was considered as significant. Based upon the survival analysis with different patterns of bone invasion, a new staging system was proposed "MMC: Marrow and mandibular canal staging system". "Akaike information criterion" (AIC) was used to study the relative fitted model of the various staging (TNM staging-AJCC8) with respect to survival parameters. Results: A total of 1,200 patients were screened; 303 patients were included in the study. On radiology review, mandibular bone was involved in 62% of patients. The pattern of bone involvement was as follows: deep cortical bone erosion (DCBE) in 23%, marrow in 34%, and marrow with the mandibular canal in 43% of patients. Patients with DCBE and no bone involvement (including superficial cortical) had similar survival [disease-free survival (DFS) and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS)], and this was significantly better than those with marrow with or without mandibular canal involvement (for both DFS and LRRFS). Patients with DCBE were staged using the MMC, and when compared with the AJCC8, the MMC system was better for the prediction of survival outcomes, as AIC values were lower compared with those of the AJCC8. There was a significant association (p = 0.013) between the type of bone involvement and the pattern of recurrence. Conclusions: For GBC-SCC, only marrow with or without mandibular canal involvement is associated with poorer survival outcomes. As compared with the AJCC8, the proposed Mahajan et al. MMC staging system downstages DCBE correlates better with survival outcomes.