Oral Toxicity and Risk of Five Insecticides to Honeybees

杨艳霞,金绍强,李少南,魏方林,朱国念
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1008-7303.2008.02.019
2008-01-01
Abstract:Two methods,small beaker and feeding tube,were adopted to measure the oral toxicity of five insecticides to honeybees,including 50% chlorfenapy WG,1% methylamino abamectin benzoate EC,80% fipronil WG,50 g/L fipronil SC,and 10% abamectin+pyridaben EC.As measured by the method of small beaker,the 48 h LC50 values of the five insecticides were 21.3,0.490,0.112,0.0757,and 0.488 mg/L,respectively,while measured by the method of feeding tube,the 48 h LC50 values were 134,0.730,1.33,0.668,and 1.54 mg/L,respectively.The result suggested that the method of small beaker overestimated toxicity of the 5 insecticides to bees compared with that of feeding tube.If it was counted by average amount of intake,the 48 h LD50 values of the five insecticides,resulting from the method of feeding tube,could be expressed as: 1.34,0.007 30,0.013 3,0.005 37,and 0.015 4 mg/bee,respectively.According to a category of toxicity for bees,which was adopted by administrative department of pesticides in China,50% chlorfenapy WG was moderately toxic,1% methylamino abamectin benzoate EC,10% abamectin+pyridaben EC,80% fipronil WG and 50 g/L fipronil SC were extremely toxic to bees.When a parameter of hazard quotients(HQ) was introduced to scale the risk of the 5 insecticides to bees,the HQ values were calculated as 84.0,3 247,3 609,and 8 939,respectively.This suggested that the 5 insecticides mentioned above might impose hazards to bees if they were applied in the field.Character and applicabilitie of the two methods were discussed.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?