Petrological and geochemical constraints on the origin of leucogranites

Guo Sushu,Li Shuguang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.06.036
2007-01-01
Earth Science Frontiers
Abstract:Leucogranite is a strong peraluminous felsic intrusion(with SiO2≥72%) linked to anatexis of continental crust.It is rich in aluminium(Al2O3≥14%),alkali elements(Na2O+K2O~8.5%) and enriched in Rb,and depleted in Th,Ba,Sr.Their ∑REE contents(mostly between 40×10-6-120×10-6) are lower than those of other granites and show slightly LREE enriched patterns and a negative Eu anomaly.The Sr-Nd-Pb-O isotopic compositions of leucogranites suggest that they were derived from continental crust by partial melting.Leucogranites are commonly found in deformed metapelite/metagraywacke sequences that have thrust over basement,during crustal thickening associated with continental collisions.There are three types of leucogranites with different petrogenesis:(1) two-mica leucogranite,which is formed by biotite and/or muscovite dehydration melting of metapelite(or metagraywacke) in middle crust;(2) tourmaline leucogranite,which is formed by muscovite dehydration melting of metapelites at lower temperature;(3) garnet-bearing leucogranite,which is most likely generated by biotite dehydration melting of felsic lower crust.The REE enriched minerals,such as monazite and apatite,as the residue phases in magma source could be responsible for depletions of REE and Th in leucogranite.Metapelite as the source rock or K-feldspar as residue phases in magma source could be responsible for depletions of Sr and Ba in leucogranite.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?