Abstract:The proliferation of technology has facilitated data accessibility, leading to an expansion in the range of criteria employed in decision problem design. This situation offers an advantage for making precise and rational decisions, but when it comes to managing spending, it becomes a disadvantage. Specifically, the expense of acquiring expert views utilized in the computation of criteria weights by subjective approaches experiences a substantial rise. Hence, decision-makers may employ objective methodologies to determine criterion weights. Nevertheless, objective methods provide a more limited range of choices compared to subjective methods. The study aims to utilize two widely recognized fundamental statistical approaches in order to enhance the capabilities of objective methods. One of the suggested approaches is the dissimilarity-based weighting method, which calculates the differentiation of values within the criteria. Another approach is the weighting method, which relies on the interquartile range. The methods were adapted as means of weighting criteria. Explanatory examples were provided, simulation-based comparisons were conducted, and ultimately applied to an actual data set. The data from each scenario were compared using the factorial analysis of variance method. The findings produced demonstrate that the proposed methods align with other objective methodologies. Furthermore, the proposed approaches were observed to take more time to finish the procedure compared to the Entropy and Standard Deviation methods, but less time compared to the Critic and Merec methods. Consequently, the suggested techniques are introduced as alternative approaches derived from established fundamental statistical procedures, which are straightforward to comprehend and valuable for professionals.

Three Calculating Weights Methods in Analytic Hierarchy Process

The Weight Calculation, Consistency Test and Improvement Based on Singular Value Decomposition

Computing Weight Vector of Comparison Matrix in AHP Based on Improved Least Square

A Study of Weight Coefficient Computing Method Based on AHP

Method of Weight Assignment for Multi-Criterion Based on Grey Interval AHP

Research on Computation Methods of AHP Wight Vector and Its Applications

A New Method for Deriving Weights in Group Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Evaluation Measures

Fuzzy Weight Evaluation Method Based on AHP

A Combination Weight Method Based On Rough Set Theory

Comprehensive Evaluation on Project Control Level of Supervision Units

Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on Weighted Least-Square Method of Complementary Judgement Matrix

Comparing the Methods on Determining the Index and Weight of the Social Welfare in Public Medical Institutions

An Improved AHP Method in Effectiveness Measure of C~3I System

A study of the weighting method for a certain type of multicriteria optimization problem

Comparison of Objective Weight Determination Methods in Network Performance Evaluation

Combination Weighting Approach Based on Deviation Function and Joint-Entropy

An Integrated Approach Towards Modeling Ranked Weights

A synthetic evaluation method based on the Grey Analytic Hierarchy Model

Basic statistical methods in determining criteria weights

Weighting Approach to Improving Objectivity of Multiple Indexes Decision-making

Determination of the weight coefficients for occupational health management evaluation indexes using analytic hierarchy process