Abstract:PURPOSE: Clinical decisions on treatment are usually based on short-term records of consecutive measurements of structure and function. Useful models for analyzing average trends and a description of statistical methods for classifying individual subjects on the basis of subject-specific trend progressions are presented.METHODS: Random effects trend models allow intercepts and slopes of the trend regression to vary across subjects around group-specific mean intercepts and mean slopes. Model results assess whether average intercepts and slopes and subject variability in intercepts and slopes are the same across groups. Fisher's discriminant functions are used for classification.RESULTS: Methods are presented and illustrated on structural visual data from a multiyear perimetry study. Average thickness of the ganglion cell layer from the optical coherence tomography macula scan and of the retinal nerve fiber layer from the optic disc scan for both glaucoma patients on optimal treatment and normal subjects are analyzed. The random effects trend model shows that average intercepts of glaucoma patients and normal subjects are quite different, but that average slopes are the same, and that the subject variability in both intercepts and slopes is larger for the glaucoma group. These findings explain why the subject-specific trend progression is not a good classifier; it is the level of the measurement (intercept or baseline value) that carries useful information in this particular cohort example.TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians base decisions on short-term records of consecutive measurements and need simple statistical tools to analyze the information. This paper discusses useful methods for analyzing short time series data. Model results assess whether there exist significant trends and whether average trends are different across groups. The paper discusses whether clinical measures classify patients reliably into disease groups, given their variability. With ever more available data, classification plays a central role of personalized medicine.

Statistical Inference for Correlated Data in Ophthalmologic Studies

Statistical methods in ophthalmology: an adjustment for the intraclass correlation between eyes.

Tutorial on Biostatistics: Statistical Analysis for Correlated Binary Eye Data

Tutorial on Biostatistics: Linear Regression Analysis of Continuous Correlated Eye Data

Extending Hui-Walter Framework to Correlated Outcomes with Application to Diagnosis Tests of an Eye Disease among Premature Infants.

Two eyes or one? The data analyst's dilemma.

Interval estimation of relative risks for combined unilateral and bilateral correlated data

Tutorial on Biostatistics: Longitudinal Analysis of Correlated Continuous Eye Data

Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology

Simultaneous confidence interval construction for many-to-one of proportion ratios of bilateral correlated data

Between-eye correlation of ocular parameters

Assessing Trends in Functional and Structural Characteristics: A Survey of Statistical Methods With an Example From Ophthalmology

Choice of Analytic Approach for Eye-Specific Outcomes: One Eye or Two?

The impact of clustering binary data on relative risk towards a study of inferential methods

Sample Size and Power Calculations with Correlated Binary Data

Robust non-parametric tests for complex-repeated measures problems in ophthalmology

Estimating intracluster correlation for ordinal data

Inferential Methods for the Tetrachoric Correlation Coefficient

Common odds ratio test and interval estimation for stratified bilateral and unilateral data

Nonparametric ROC Summary Statistics for Correlated Diagnostic Marker Data

Inferential procedures based on the weighted Pearson correlation coefficient test statistic