Abstract:Introduction Developments in production practices and technological advances in seed genetics have given cotton farmers new options to consider in maximizing profits. Besides conventional cotton, farmers have available genetically modified cotton varieties, such as Bt, Roundup Ready (RR), Buctril Resistant (BXN), and stacked gene (BtRR). Transgenic varieties have a built-in resistance to certain pests (Bt cotton is toxic to the cotton bollworm and tobacco budworm) or tolerance to herbicides (Roundup Ready and Buctril Resistant cotton). These varieties allow substitution of current inputs by alternative inputs that are complementary to transgenic seeds. Alternative cultural practices available to farmers are conventional tillage and conservation tillage (strip-till, no-till, or reduced tillage). With the rapid expansion of available technology, it is difficult for farmers to evaluate combinations of inputs in order to maximize profits. Impact assessments are available for benefits of adopting genetically modified (GM) crops. FernandezCornejo and McBride (2002) apply survey data from US farmers over a two-year period. Production of GM cotton, corn, and soybeans have a consistently positive impact on yields, but only 50% of the reported results have a positive impact for net returns. The level of infestation and the seed premium paid by the farmer determine increased profitability of insect resistant crops. Use of GM crops is correlated with reduced aggregate use of pesticides. Although farmers having previously adopted conservation tillage practices tend to select herbicide tolerant crops, available data does not support herbicide tolerant crops leading to increased adoption of conservation tillage. Farmers make simultaneous decisions about multiple pest control solutions that are interdependent (Kalaitzandonakes & Suntornpithug, 2001). A survey of cotton producers attempts to determine the reasons that farmers adopt GM cotton varieties. Adoption of GM cotton is primarily due to effective control of pests. This is related to the yield enhancement result of FernandezCornejo and McBride (2002). Other factors for adoption are cost savings and reduction of production risks. Synergies between herbicide resistance and conservation tillage practices are quantified. In this study, adoption of varieties with RR technology leads to adoption of conservation tillage practices. Other research examines different aspects of growing genetically modified cotton varieties. Wier, Mullins, and Mills (1998) conduct economic analysis of Bollgard (Bt) cotton relative to conventional cotton varieties in Mississippi and conclude that Bollgard is superior to conventional cotton. However, Bachelor, Mott, and Morrison (1998) do not find significant economic benefits of growing Bt cotton in North Carolina and recommend it only for difficult-to-treat fields and environmentally sensitive areas. Limited information exists on comparing costs and benefits across genetically modified varieties. Therefore, there is a need for a more general and conclusive study of economic impacts of growing genetically modified cotton varieties. An aspect that needs further investigation is the effect of combining different technologies with alternative tillage practices. Bell, Harris, and Wilson (1998) evaluate the implications of conservation tillage (strip tillage in particular) on fertilizer effectiveness for conventional cotton. It has been posited that Roundup Ready technology may enhance the benefits of conservation tillage. Therefore, the objective of this study is to provide an economic analysis of efficiency and profit Clayton W. Ward County Extension Agent, University of Georgia

The Relationship of Gin Date to Aflatoxin Contamination of Cottonseed in Arizona

Aspergillus flavus growth and aflatoxin production as influenced by total lipid content during growth and development of cottonseed

Cadmium-Induced Structure Change of Pigment Glands and the Reduction of the Gossypol Content in Cottonseed Kernels

Effect of Aspergillus flavus inoculation methods and environmental conditions on aflatoxin accumulation in corn hybrids

Factors influencing aflatoxin B1 levels in the groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm of Ethiopia

QTL analysis for gossypol and protein contents in upland cottonseeds with two different genetic systems across environments

Cost of Aflatoxin to the Farmer, Buying Point, and Sheller Segments of the Southeast United States Peanut Industry

Analysis of Genetic Effect and Correlation for Seed Quality Traits in Transgenic Bt Insect-resistant Cotton

Temperature and Moisture Conditions That Affect Aflatoxin Contamination of Peanuts

Aflatoxin production of species and strains of the Aspergillus flavus group isolated from field crops

Characterization of the Aspergillus flavus Population from Highly Aflatoxin-Contaminated Corn in the United States

Spatial and temporal population dynamics of Aspergillus flavus in commercial pistachio orchards in Arizona

Characterization of Physiological Traits, Yield and Fiber Quality in Three Upland Cotton Cultivars Grown under Cadmium Stress

Nutrients, Ultrastructures, and Cd Subcellular Localization in the Cottonseeds of Three Upland Cotton Cultivars under Cd Stress

Genetic Analysis of Seed Density and Kernal Percentage at Different Developmental Stages in Upland Cotton (gossypium Hirsutum L.)

Aflatoxin in maize: a review of the early literature from “moldy-corn toxicosis” to the genetics of aflatoxin accumulation resistance

Bt corn and cotton planting may benefit peanut growers by reducing aflatoxin risk

The Effects of Kernel Type (Inshell, Shelled and Split Almonds) on the Growth and Aflatoxin Production of A. flavus Under Different Combinations of Water Activity and Temperature

Effects of soil moisture and temperature on preharvest invasion of peanuts by the Aspergillus flavus group and subsequent aflatoxin development

Efficiency of Alternative Technologies and Cultural Practices for Cotton in Georgia

Effect of Temperature, Water Activity and Other Toxigenic Mold Species on Growth of Aspergillus flavus and Aflatoxin Production on Corn, Pinto Beans and Soybeans