A Comparative Study of the Status of Foreigners in Civil Law: On the Foreign Element of Article 14 of "General Principles of Civil Law" and Its Conflicts with Subordinate Legislations
Guo-dong Xu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.19563/j.cnki.sdfx.2018.02.002
2018-01-01
Abstract:Foreigners could be divided into many subtypes with different legal status, including friendly foreigners, hostile aliens, diplomatic personnel, legal residents and illegal immigrants, refugees, "mild" foreigners, "unconsolidated" foreigners and stateless persons. They are regarded as "artificial" foreigners together with those indigenous persons who have not been naturalized and those being deprived of their public rights. Between the range of foreigners and citizens, there are intermediate citizens like overseas citizens, citizens with dual nationality, residents of Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and those with permanent residency cards. It's worthy of drawing on the experiences of Roman law and Chinese ancient law in dealing with the legal status of foreigners. With a few exceptions of regulations which treat foreigners and citizens equally, modern laws impose more or less restrictions on the legal capacity of foreigners. China is no exception. In 2017, the State Council promulgated the negative list of foreign investment access in the Free Trade Zone, which constitutes a sub-law that greatly limits the legal capacity of foreigners. However, Article 14 of the "General Principles of Civil Law" grants foreigners the same legal capacities as Chinese citizens. As a result, there is conflict between the subordinate legislation and the general law. Such conflict can only be resolved by a proviso to Article 14 by means of judicial interpretations.