Exploring the Molecular Pathways of Intracranial Aneurysm Formation in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease Using Proteomic Analysis
Jin-Myung Kim,Hee-Sung Ahn,Mi Joung Kim,Hye Eun Kwon,Youngmin Ko,Joo Hee Jung,Hyun Wook Kwon,Young Hoon Kim,Jiyoung Yu,Kyunggon Kim,Sung Shin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.11.07.24316796
2024-11-08
Abstract:Introduction: Intracranial aneurysm (IA) frequently coincides with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), exhibiting incidence rates nearly 10 times higher than the general population. However, the exact mechanism of how these two conditions is related remains unclear. This study aims to identify mechanisms behind IA occurrence in ADPKD patients using proteomics and to discover potential protein biomarkers for early diagnosis.
Method: Pre-kidney transplantation ADPKD patients underwent cranial CT and/or MR angiography, with findings dictating assignment to either a control group (ADPKD without IA, n=20) or IA group (ADPKD with IA, n=9). During transplantation, bilateral nephrectomy was performed and native renal arteries were sampled for proteomic analysis via a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Differentially expressed proteins were subjected to bioinformatic analysis and a protein-protein interaction network analysis.
Results: Eight proteins showed significant variation between IA and control groups, with four proteins upregulated (DIS3, RAB6A, MMS19, EXOC8) and four downregulated (CLUH, SYNC, MEF2D, WDR36) in IA group (Log2 fold change (FC) >2 and false discovery rate (FDR] q-value <0.05) compared to the control group. These proteins correlated with pathways implicated in IA development, such as ciliopathy, exocytosis, inflammation, extracellular matrix remodelling, and apoptosis. These proteins were quantitatively validated using Western blot analysis and found to be consistent with proteomic data. Moreover, a connection was observed between protein expression and clinical metrics (bilirubin, prothrombin time, platelet count), indicating their potential as early diagnostic markers.
Conclusion: This study is the first to employ renal artery samples to study underlying mechanisms for IA in ADPKD patients by proteomics. We identified and validated novel candidate markers that are either upregulated or downregulated in the IA group compared to the control group. This research's finding opens new avenues for understanding and diagnosing IA in ADPKD, potentially leading to earlier diagnosis and targeted treatments.
Transplantation