A cross-sectional study of supervision in Shanghai mental health service industry
Lu LU,Jianyu WANG,Xiaoping LI,Yan WANG,Rui GAO,Yue ZHENG,Tianran ZHANG,Xin FAN,Chengjiao ZHANG,Qian BIAN,Bin XIE,Haiyin ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2018.04.002
2018-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To understand the status of supervision of mental health service industry in Shanghai, and to provide reference for further strengthening the construction of mental health service system in Shanghai. Methods: In Shanghai, 107 mental health service agencies (including psychiatric institutions, non-specialist medical institutions, non-specialist enterprise and public institutions, social institutions) were selected from Shanghai psychological service industry association. The survey was conducted with the Questionnaire on Current Situation of Mental Health Professional Service Agencies in Shanghai (agency survey), including the "relevant information of agency" and the "management of the agency in the field of mental health services"(whether the agency had supervision requirements on the mental health service personnel, whether the agency organized supervision, the source of supervisors and payment method), and the Questionnaire on Current Situation of Mental Health Service Professionals in Shanghai (professional survey), including "basic information on demography "and" psychological professional work" (the number of hours of supervision in 2015, the cost of supervision, and the form of supervision and payment method). These two parts of questionnaire were selected and analyzed. Results: Agency survey results showed that 80％ of non-specialist enterprises had no supervision requirements for mental health service personnel, supervisor in non-specialist medical institutions were mainly from psychiatric institution (52.9％). The cost of supervision in most psychiatric institutions was paid by the agency (39.1％) and the cost of supervision in most public institutions was paid by professional (37％). The professional institutions under the jurisdiction of other departments within the unit required less supervision of the professional staff than the independent institutions (P ＜ 0.001). Professional survey results showed that the number of supervision hours of mental health service professional in social institutions was more than that in the other three types of institutions (P ＜0.001), of which 47.9％ chosen to pay the cost of supervision by themselves. The proportion of their own payment in social institutions was higher than that in the other three types of institutions (P ＜0.001). Conclusion:The social institutions in Shanghai have the best supervision of social institutions, followed by the supervision of the medical institutions. The supervision of non-medical enterprises and their personnel needs to be improved.