Platelet‐activating Factor and Endotoxin Activate CCAAT/enhancer Binding Protein in Rat Small Intestine

H Wang,XW Qu,IG De Plaen,W Hsueh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjp.0704102
IF: 7.3
2001-01-01
British Journal of Pharmacology
Abstract:The transcription factor family CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (C/EBP) is involved in inflammation via the regulation of the gene expression of various pro‐inflammatory cytokines and proteins. PAF and endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) are known agents causing intestinal inflammation and injury. In this study, we examined the binding activity of C/EBP isoforms in rat small intestine in response to PAF (1.5 μg kg−1, i.v.) or LPS (5 mg kg−1, i.v.). We found that C/EBP is constitutively active in normal small intestine, mainly as C/EBP‐α and β (C/EBP‐β>α). Both C/EBP‐α and β are localized in the intestinal epithelial cells: C/EBP‐α mainly in the crypts, and C/EBP‐β in both villi and crypts, as well as in some lamina propria cells. Only minute amounts of C/EBP‐δ were found. PAF rapidly upregulates the binding activity of C/EBP‐α and β within 30 min. The increase in C/EBP‐α is prominent in the crypt cells, whereas the change of C/EBP‐β is more widespread. LPS also increases the binding activity of C/EBP‐α and β, and the response is slower than PAF. PAF synergizes with LPS to markedly activate all three subunits. The increase in C/EBP‐α is transient, whereas the other two have a sustained elevation until 120 min. After challenge with PAF (but not LPS), small amounts of nuclear factor ‐κB (NF‐κB) p50 and p65 subunits are found in the C/EBP‐DNA binding complex, indicating cross‐dimerization of the two transcription families. Pretreatment of rats with pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) suppresses LPS‐, but not PAF‐, induced NF‐κB and C/EBP binding activity, and significantly increases the C/EBP‐δ subunit in LPS‐ or PAF‐induced C/EBP complex. These results suggest that PAF and LPS activate intestinal C/EBP in vivo, probably via different pathways. British Journal of Pharmacology (2001) 133, 713–721; doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704102
What problem does this paper attempt to address?