Thin-section CT of the Lungs: Eye-Tracking Analysis of the Visual Approach to Reading Tiled and Stacked Display Formats.

S. M. Ellis,X. Hu,L. Dempere-Marco,G. Z. Yang,A. U. Wells,D. M. Hansell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.006
IF: 4.531
2006-01-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:Objective: To use eye-tracking analysis to identify the differences in approach to and efficiency of reading thin-section CT of the lungs presented tiled and stacked soft-copy displays.Materials and methods: Four chest radiologists read 16 thin-section CT examinations displayed in either a tiled (four images at once) or stacked (full screen cine) format. Eye-movements were recorded and analysed in terms of movement type; saccade distance (classified by the calculated range of useful peripheral vision), number of fixations, duration and direction of gaze-comparison of the areas of the images viewed.Results: Cases presented in stacked format were read quicker than when presented in tiled format with a greater fixation frequency (5 fixations versus 4.5 fixations points per 100 data points; p < 0.001) and a greater proportion of short saccades (97% versus 94%; p < 0.005). The consistency with which the observers viewed equivalent areas of the scan images in different cases was greater when viewing in stacked format (mean kappa 0.45 versus 0.36; p < 0.05) suggesting a more systematic approach to reading.Conclusion: Eye-tracking data demonstrates why thin-section CT examinations of the lungs are read more efficiently when displayed in a stack as opposed to a tiled format. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?