Abstract:Background: Finishing and polishing of composite resin restorations can be considered two different procedures or two steps of a single procedure. During the finishing procedure, contours are corrected while margins and irregularities are smoothened. The polishing procedures result in the production of a smooth and lustrous finish. Consensus regarding the correct timing for initiating the steps of finishing and polishing after the curing of the composite resins is divided. Some authors support immediate finishing and polishing while other authors support delaying the finishing and polishing procedures. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the surface roughness and microhardness of composite resin restoration subjected to finishing and three different polishing systems immediately and after 24 h. Materials and method: Eighty composite resin samples were prepared. A Teflon mold was made which was customized for this study having dimensions of 10-mm diameter and 2-mm depth. For the first group of specimens, Group I (n = 20) the composite resin surface was covered with Mylar Strips which acted as control. The other specimens (n = 60) were prepared without the use of a Mylar strip, followed by curing. For all the samples, curing was done with a light-emitting diode for 40 s each. Eighty light-cured samples were divided equally into 4 groups, each group containing 20 samples (n = 20). Out of the 20 samples, in the second, third, and fourth groups, (Kenda C. G. I., Shofu Super-snap X-Treme, and Eve Diacomp Plus Twist) 10 samples were finished and polished immediately after curing and the other 10 samples were finished and polished after 24 h of curing. The samples in Groups II, III, and IV were subjected to finishing by a 12-fluted tungsten carbide bur and were polished according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The samples were then subjected to quantitative analysis of surface roughness by a noncontact three-dimensional optical profilometer (Bruker GT-Q; Ettlingen, Germany) and qualitative analysis of surface roughness by a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss EVO 18 Special Edition; Carl-Zeiss-Strasse; Oberkochen Germany) at ×10,000 magnification. The samples were also subjected to Vickers microhardness measurement using a microhardness tester (Leica VMHT 001; Walter UHL GmbH, Germany) under 100 g load over 10 s. Conclusion: A. For surface roughness: The samples cured under Mylar strips gave the least surface roughness values (0.25 ± 0.032). Immediate finishing and polishing procedures led to statistically less surface roughness than when finishing and polishing procedures were performed after a delay of 24 h for all polishing systems used B. For microhardness: The samples cured under Mylar strips gave the least microhardness values (57.1 ± 2.03). Delayed finishing and polishing increased microhardness values in all finishing and polishing systems used. Different polishing systems did not have any significant effect on the microhardness values in immediate and delayed finishing and polishing groups.

Effects of Three Finishing and Polishing Procedures on the Surface of Six Resin Composites

Comparisons of effects of different polishing systems on PFM and composite resin surfaces

Effects of Filler Components on Surface Roughness of Composite Resin Materials after Polishing

The effect of contemporary finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of bulk fill resin composite and nanocomposites

Effect of polishing on surface roughness and surface-free energy of direct tooth-colored restorative materials

Surface roughness and microhardness evaluation of composite resin restorations subjected to three different polishing systems immediately and after 24 h: An in vitro study

Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of various bulk‐fill and nano‐filled resin‐based composites: An atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy study

A comparative study of polishing systems on optical properties and surface roughness of additively manufactured and conventional resin based composites

Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins

Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures

Effect of finishing/polishing techniques and time on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials

Observation and comparison of polished composite surfaces with the aid of SEM and profilometer

The Effect of Different Finishing and Polishing Systems on Surface Properties of New Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite

Surface Roughness and Gloss of Polished Nanofilled and Nanohybrid Resin Composites

[Surface Roughness, Gloss and Sequential Polishing Times of Various Chairside Computer Aided Design/manufacturing Restorative Materials].

Effect of Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Color Stability of Aged and Stained Bulk-Fill Resin Composites

Effects of polishing press-on force on surface roughness and gloss of CAD-CAM composites

Finishing and polishing systems influence the roughness and color stability of acrylic and bis-acryl composite resins

A comparison of polishing systems and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color stability of a single-shade resin composite

Effect of different polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss values of single-shade resin composites

The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites