Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair using the Preclose technique:a single center experience

TANG Xiao,GUO Da-qiao,CHEN Bin,SHI Zhen-yu,XU Xin,JIANG Jun-hao,YANG Jue,DONG Zhi-hui,WANG Li-xin,LIN Chang-po,WANG Yu-qi,FU Wei-guo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-7429.2013.03.012
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the safety and efficacy of percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair(pEVAR) using the Perclose ProGlide closure system. Methods From December 2012 to July 2013,clinical data of 57 pEVAR cases were analyzed retrospectively,including perioperative complications and treatment. Results The technical success rate of pEVAR was 100%(57/57). The mean operating time was(93.5±17.8) min. Multiple ProGlide devices were used in a total of 106 femoral sites,including 20F~22 F access sites(n=36) and ≤ 18F access sites(n=70). The initial technical success rate for the ProGlide closure devices was 88.7%(94/106),and the secondary technical success rate was 91.5%(97/106). ProGlide devices failed to achieve hemostasis for 5 patients. Surgical hemostasis(n=2) and local compression(n=3) were required. For 4patients,ProGlide devices caused the stenosis or occlusion lesion in the puncture site,which were treated with surgical repair. The rate of blue toe syndrome was 5.7%(6/106). All the patients were discharged with no perioperative mortality. Conclusion Percutaneous closure technique using multiple Perclose ProGlide devices appears safe and effective in endovascular stent-graft treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Local access related complications would be low in selected patients,providing that the operator has sufficient practical experience of this technique.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?