Abstract:Reflectivity inversion is a key step in reservoir prediction. Conventional sparse‐spike deconvolution assumes that the reflectivity (reflection coefficient series) is sparse and solves for the reflection coefficients by an L1‐norm inversion process. Spectral inversion is an alternative to sparse‐spike deconvolution, which is based on the odd–even decomposition algorithm and can accurately identify thin layers and reduce the wavelet tuning effect without using constraints from logging data, from horizon interpretations or from an initial model of the reflectivity. In seismic processing, an error exists in wavelet extraction because of complex geological structures, resulting in the low accuracy of deconvolution and inversion. Blind deconvolution is an effective method for solving the problem mentioned above, which comprises seismic wavelet and reflectivity sequence, assuming that the wavelets that affect some subsets of the seismic data are approximately the same. Therefore, we combined blind deconvolution with spectral inversion to propose blind spectral inversion. Given an initial wavelet, we can calculate the reflectivity based on spectral inversion and update the wavelet for the next iteration. During the update processing, we add the smoothness of the wavelet amplitude spectrum as a regularization term, thus reducing the wavelet oscillation in the time domain, increasing the similarity between inverted and initial wavelets, and improving the stability of the solution. The blind spectral inversion method inherits the wavelet robustness of blind deconvolution and high resolution of spectral inversion, which is suitable for reflectivity inversion. Applications to synthetic and field seismic datasets demonstrate that the blind spectral inversion method can accurately calculate the reflectivity even when there is an error in wavelet extraction.

Blind wavelet estimation using a zero-lag slice of the fourth-order statistics

WAVELET PHASE ELIMINATION METHOD TO MAK E THE WAVELET PHASE TO BE ZERO

Q estimation based on logarithmic spectral areas with different high and low frequencies

Reflected wave least squares reverse time migration with angle illumination compensation

Blind channel estimation using zero-lag slice of third-order moment

Non‐minimum‐phase Wavelet Estimation Using Second‐ and Third‐order Moments

A Multitask Learning-Based Dynamic Wavelet Amplitude Spectra Extraction Method and Its Application in Q Estimation

Blind Image Deconvolution Using the Zero-Lag Slice of Higher-Order Statistics

Bandwidth-insensitive Extended Centroid Frequency Shift Method for Near-Surface Q Estimation

Estimation of the depth-variant seismic wavelet based on the modified unscaled S-transform

Wavelet Joint Extraction Method Based on Seismic Velocity and Acceleration Signals

Estimation of the depth-domain seismic wavelet based on velocity substitution and a generalized seismic wavelet model

Regularized phase retrieval for seismic wavelet estimation and blind deconvolution

Improving Both Seismic Section Signal‐noise Ratio and Resolution by the Properties of Wavelet Transform Zero‐crossings and Polynomial Fitting

Improving Time Estimation by Blind Deconvolution: with Applications to TOFD and Backscatter Sizing

The Quadratic Wasserstein Metric with Squaring Scaling for Seismic Velocity Inversion

Prediction of Low-Frequency Seismic Data Without Relying on Wavelet Using Deep Learning

Phase Retrieval: A Data-Driven Wavelet Frame Based Approach

A robust method for instantaneous frequency estimation via inverse spectral decomposition

Accurate Determination of P-wave Back Azimuth and Slowness Parameters by Sparsity Constrained Seismic Array Analysis

Blind spectral inversion of seismic data