Abstract:Testing of noninferiority has become increasingly important in modern medicine as a means of comparing a new test procedure to a currently available test procedure. Asymptotic methods have recently been developed for analyzing noninferiority trials using rate ratios under the matched-pair design. In small samples, however, the performance of these asymptotic methods may not be reliable, and they are not recommended. In this article, we investigate alternative methods that are desirable for assessing noninferiority trials, using the rate ratio measure under small-sample matched-pair designs. In particular, we propose an exact and an approximate exact unconditional test, along with the corresponding confidence intervals based on the score statistic. The exact unconditional method guarantees the type I error rate will not exceed the nominal level. It is recommended for when strict control of type I error (protection against any inflated risk of accepting inferior treatments) is required. However, the exact method tends to be overly conservative (thus, less powerful) and computationally demanding. Via empirical studies, we demonstrate that the approximate exact score method, which is computationally simple to implement, controls the type I error rate reasonably well and has high power for hypothesis testing. On balance, the approximate exact method offers a very good alternative for analyzing correlated binary data from matched-pair designs with small sample sizes. We illustrate these methods using two real examples taken from a crossover study of soft lenses and a Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia study. We contrast the methods with a hypothetical example.

Sample size determination for establishing equivalence/noninferiority via ratio of two proportions in matched-pair design.

Sample Size Determination for Establishing Equivalence/Noninferiority Via Ratio of Two Proportions in Matched–Pair Design

Sample Size Determination for Matched-Pair Equivalence Trials Using Rate Ratio

Sample size determination for testing nonzero difference of two proportions in matched-pair design

Statistical Analysis of Noninferiority Trials with a Rate Ratio in Small-Sample Matched-Pair Designs.

Sample Size Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Assessing Equivalence/noninferiority for Paired Binary Data

On sample size calculation based on odds ratio in clinical trials.

Tests for equivalence based on odds ratio for matched-pair design

Sample size formula for general win ratio analysis

A Simple Formula for Sample Size Calculation in Equivalence Studies

Two New Methods for Non-Inferiority Testing of the Ratio in Matched-Pair Setting

Sample size for testing difference between two proportions for the bilateral-sample design.

A Note on Sample Size Calculation for Mean Comparisons Based on Noncentral T-Statistics.

Confidence Interval Construction for Proportion Difference in Small‐sample Paired Studies

Statistical analysis of non-inferiority via non-zero risk difference in stratified matched-pair studies

Unconditional Exact Tests for Equivalence or Noninferiority for Paired Binary Endpoints

Confidence-Interval Construction for Rate Ratio in Matched-Pair Studies with Incomplete Data

Sample-size Determination for Two Independent Binomial Experiments

Homogeneity Test Of Difference Between Two Correlated Proportions In Stratified Matched-Pair Studies

Bayesian Sample Size Calculations For Comparing Two Binomial Proportions

Sample Size Determination and Re‐estimation for Matched Pair Designs with Multiple Binary Endpoints