Effect of the low-osmolality nonionic contrast media on renal function in patients undergoing coronary intervention: a prospective study

JI Jun,DING Xiao-qiang,XU Xun-hui,HE Jian-qiang,BO Jin,QIAN Ju-ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:1001-7097.2006.07.003
2006-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyse the effect of the low osmolar nonionic contrast medium on renal function in patients undergoing coronary angiography and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To study the incidence and risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). Methods Three hundred and fifteen patients undergoing PCI or coronary-angiography from December 2004 to March 2005 were enrolled in this study. All patients received low-osmolality nonionic contrast agent. Scr, N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and the osmolality of urine were measured at any time three days before the angiography and at 1 , 2 and 6 days post procedure. Multivariate predictors of contrast-induced nephropathy were determined using logistic regression. Result (1)Among the 315 patients, 231 were males and 84 females. The average age was (63.5±11.6) years. Nineteen patients (6.03%) experienced CIN and the incidence of CIN was 6.03%. In those who had both DM and renal insufficiency, the incidence of CIN was 4/8, which was significantly higher than those who had normal renal function and/or DM (P < 0.05,P< 0.01); (2) In 19 patients who had CIN, the level of urine NAG and Scr at day 1 and 2 post angiography were higher than those before the procedure (P<0.05), but they were decreased to normal level at day 6 following angiography. (3) The incidence of previously recorded renal dysfunction was 9/19 in CIN patients and 10.5% (317 296)in non-CIN patients, respectively (P<0.01). The average contrast volume was (318.4±153.8)ml in CIN group whereas (227.9±121.9) ml in non-CIN group, and significant difference was found between the two groups(P< 0.01). Identified by logistic regression, the volume of contrast agent and pre-existed renal dysfunction were independent risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy. Conclusions The incidence of CIN in patients who had renal dysfunction combining with DM previously is higher than that in other patients. The urinary NAG indicates early impact of renal tubular function. The volume of contrast and pre-existed renal dysfunction are independent risk factors of contrast-induced nephropathy.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?