Abstract:Can-do statements have been integrated for decades into research and marketing strategies related to standardized tests of English for non-native language learners. For instance, while ETS indicated that TOEIC can-do statements are specifically for “decision making in organizations,” the Council of Europe created user-friendly statements that all stakeholders, including test takers, can use and understand. This study discusses a partial replication of a large-scale validity study with the purpose of developing a scale which can be used by examinees in combination with the TOEIC SW can-do statements for self-assessment. As part of an extracurricular program, 23 graduate-level EAL university students took the TOEIC SW and speaking and writing can-do self-assessment surveys. Results indicated that both self-assessment scales used in this study had moderate to strong correlations with TOEIC SW scores (r = 0.62–0.73) and TOEIC proficiency levels (r = 0.47–0.66). Self-assessment results using a Level Mean Average (LMA) scale correlated significantly with both speaking and writing test results and produced slightly higher percentages of test takers self-assessing within the true score zones of 1 SEM. For the most part, self-assessment predictive accuracy using these scales and true score zones was 52–57% for speaking and 43% for writing. Other findings were that EAL learners tended to underestimate their scores, and they more accurately self-assessed speaking than writing. If LMA scale accuracy at a particular level can be verified in future studies, claims could be made that TOEIC SW can-do statements have value for examinees.

The Background of and Approach to Can-do Description of Language Ability: Taking CEFR as an Example

Developing Common Listening Ability Scales for Chinese Learners of English

Creating a unified scale of language ability in China

Linguistic Features Distinguishing Students' Writing Ability Aligned with CEFR Levels

Several Problems about Developing a Descriptor Pool of China Common Framework for English Proficiency Scale

The Development of STEP, the CEFR-Based English Proficiency Test

Factor analysis of English speaking ability descriptors and their scaling:An empirical study

Development and Validation of A Computer Adaptive Efl Test

The Study on the Corresponding Scales between Business Chinese Test(BCT) and Common European Framework of Reference(CEFR)

Review on the validity of China’s Standards of English Language Ability

Diagnosing Writing Ability Using China’s Standards of English Language Ability: Application of Cognitive Diagnosis Models

Comparing Reading Comprehension in Business Chinese Test (BCT) with Common European Framework (CEFR)

A Working Analysis of the Tasks of Teaching and Assessment of Chinese as a Second Language

Going Global: the Successful Link of IELTS and Aptis to China’s Standards of English Language Ability (CSE)

Ability Assessment Based on CAT in Adaptive Learning System

Qualitative insights and a first evaluation tool for teaching with cognitive discourse function: “comparing” in the CLIL science classroom

Assessing Students’ Translation Competence: Integrating China’s Standards of English With Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Approaches

TESTING THE TEST: ASPECTS OF CET 4 REVISITED

Assessment instruments for primary CLIL: the conceptualisation and evaluation of test tasks

Test-taker self-assessment accuracy using the TOEIC speaking and writing can-do statements

Communicative Language Teaching in EFL settings: A Long Way to Go