The Relationship Between Negative Coping Styles, Psychological Resilience, and Positive Coping Styles in Military Personnel: A Cross-Lagged Analysis
Mingxuan Zou,Bin Liu,Jing Ji,Lei Ren,Xiuchao Wang,Fengzhan Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s447096
IF: 3.974
2024-01-03
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Mingxuan Zou, 1, 2, &ast Bin Liu, 2, &ast Jing Ji, 1 Lei Ren, 3, 4 Xiuchao Wang, 2 Fengzhan Li 2 1 Public Health School, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, 712046, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Military Medical Psychology, Air Force Medical University, Xi' an, 710032, People's Republic of China; 3 Military Psychology Section, Logistics University of PAP, Tianjin, 300309, People's Republic of China; 4 Military Mental Health Services & Research Center, Tianjin, 300309, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Fengzhan Li; Xiuchao Wang, Email ; Background: Military personnel experience prolonged exposure to high-stress environments. Positive coping styles can assist in maintaining their mental and behavioral well-being, whereas negative coping styles cannot. Health behavior change theory specifies that an individual can transition from a negative to a positive coping style. The psychological resilience concept may prove vital in this transition. Methods: In a longitudinal study design, two questionnaires were administered to 233 military personnel twice, the first at T1 in April 2023 and the second at T2 in July 2023. The questionnaire measured individual negative coping style, positive coping style and psychological resilience. Results: The data showed that the negative coping style at T1 negatively predicted the level of psychological resilience at T2 (γ= - 0.26, p < 0.001) and the positive coping style at T2 (γ= - 0.16, p < 0.001). The level of psychological resilience at T1 positively predicted the positive coping style at T2 (γ= 0.22, p < 0.01). Psychological resilience played a mediating role between negative coping style and positive coping style. In addition, there was an interaction between psychological resilience and positive coping style in military personnel at the two time points. Conclusion: The negative coping styles that presently exist among military personnel have the potential to diminish their future positive coping styles by lowering their psychological resilience. This highlights the need to focus on the development and training of psychological resilience for military personnel, as it can effectively counteract negative coping styles and promote positive coping styles. Keywords: military personnel, coping style, resilience, cross-lagged analysis Coping style refers to the cognitive and behavioral ways that individuals use to reduce their psychological distress when faced with stressful events and situations. 1 Researchers used factor analysis method to extract the common characteristics of all types of coping styles and divided them into positive and negative coping styles. 2 Positive coping styles reflect that individuals engage in some cognitive or behavioral strategies that can lead to positive outcomes when they encounter stress, such as changing cognition by deploying cognitive resources, actively solving problems or seeking social support from family and friends. 3 Negative coping styles reflect the tendency of individuals to adopt cognitive or behavioral strategies that can lead to negative outcomes when they encounter stress, such as cognitive avoidance, expression suppression and substance abuse. 4 The dual-factor model of mental health posits that life satisfaction and mental illness symptoms constitute crucial positive and negative indicators, respectively, for diagnosing mental health condition. 5 Notably, the two coping styles have opposing influences on mental health condition across both positive and negative indicators. 6–10 For example, when an individual faces a stressful event of social rejection, positive coping style can reduce the impact of the stressful event and allow the individual to maintain a normal level of life satisfaction, while negative coping style will reduce life satisfaction. 8 When college students face negative life events (eg school bullying, poor grades), positive coping style can alleviate symptoms of depression, whereas negative coping style can worsen symptoms of depression. 6 Previous studies have shown that negative and positive coping styles have different effects, 8–10 and the coping styles adopted by individuals are comprehensive, including both positive and negative aspects. 2 According to the theory of health behavior change, 11 negative coping style is an unfavorable factor in one's own psychological resources that can induce negative emotions and affect one's mental and physical health, wh -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary