Abstract:<p>Increasing growth and development of building industry and civil engineering motivates enterprises to advance bid evaluation process in an effort to ameliorate building quality and diminish construction cost. The selection of qualified construction contractor has been generally formulated and addressed as a multi-attribute group decision-making problem. However, few existing studies have taken the reasoning logic pattern in human cognition process and the compensatory among attributes into account. Therefore, a two-stage logic scoring of preference-ELECTRE III-based approach is established for the management and manipulation of bidder selection. In a bid to facilitate expert evaluation articulation, alternative-attribute assessments in this approach take the form of generalized comparative linguistic expressions, which are subsequently converted into possibility-distribution-based hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set via the similarity measure-based generation approach to enhance information quality and reliability. Then, nonlinear optimization-based direction rules are introduced to advance the automatic minimum-distance-based consensus reaching model and based on which, the individual semantic-embedded assessments are algorithmically adjusted to reach acceptable consensus. Furthermore, the expert and attribute importance degrees are extracted from both semantic and formal logic aspects, and the modified individual assessments are gathered by integrating the two-stage logic scoring of preference aggregation structure and the ELECTRE III method. The present approach provides a solution to bid evaluation problems considering the reasoning logic pattern in human cognition process and the compensatory among attributes. A practical case study and a comparative analysis are performed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the established multi-attribute group decision-making approach.</p>

Expert Elicitation of Adversary Preferences Using Ordinal Judgments

An Approach to the Extraction of Preference-Related Information from Design Team Language

A Comparison of Formal Methods for Evaluating the Language of Preference in Engineering Design

A Probabilistic Approach for Extracting Design Preferences from Design Team Discussion

Use (and abuse) of expert elicitation in support of decision making for public policy

A Preference Elicitation Approach for the Ordered Weighted Averaging Criterion using Solution Choice Observations

The Variable Precision Method for Elicitation of Probability Weighting Functions.

Eliciting Kemeny Rankings

The Value of Performance Weights and Discussion in Aggregated Expert Judgments

Bid evaluation in civil construction under uncertainty: A two-stage LSP-ELECTRE III-based approach

Estimating the Attribute Weights Through Evidential Reasoning and Mathematical Programming.

Expertise-Structure and Risk-Appetite-Integrated Two-Tiered Collective Opinion Generation Framework for Large-Scale Group Decision Making

Weights generation models based on acceptance degrees in decision making

Adversarial Mixture Of Experts with Category Hierarchy Soft Constraint

On global robustness of an adversarial risk analysis solution

Asymptotically Optimal Adversarial Strategies for the Probability Estimation Framework

On the Pros and Cons of Active Learning for Moral Preference Elicitation

Manipulation of individual judgments in the quantitative pairwise comparisons method

Using the Data Agreement Criterion to Rank Experts' Beliefs

Communicating uncertainty in national security intelligence: Expert and nonexpert interpretations of and preferences for verbal and numeric formats

Extracting the Wisdom of a Smaller Crowd Fromdependent Quantile Judgments