Abstract:Most empirical studies based on U.S. data suggest that the fiscal multiplier is less than 1 (e.g., Barro and Redlick, 2011). However, Keynes argued that the multiplier would be the largest when markets have failed to the greatest extent in coordinating economic activities (such as during the Great Depression with rampant unemployment and low capacity utilization). As a large developing country with high household saving rates, a large pool of rural labor force, and a wide range of market failures, China offers a unique opportunity to test the Keynesian notion that government expenditures (even as a pure waste of aggregate resources) can have a fiscal multiplier larger than 1 on aggregate income. Perhaps even more exceptional is China’s extensive use of government spending as a major policy tool to stimulate the economy over the past three decades. Based on both aggregate time-series data and panel data from 29 Chinese provinces, we find that the fiscal multiplier in China is larger than 2. We provide a theoretical model with market failures and Monte Carlo analysis to rationalize our empirical findings. Specifically, we build a model that can generate the same multiplier and business cycles observed in China and use the model as a data-generating process to gauge whether structural vector autoregressions can yield consistent estimates of the theoretical multiplier in short samples. Our analysis supports the large multiplier found in China but also suggests that government spending may not necessarily be a free lunch despite the large multiplier.

Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?——Based on a cross countries panel data analysis

Effect of Trade Openness on Regional Economic Growth in China: Revisiting the Discussion

Government Size and Economic Development:An Empirical Analysis Based on a World Panel Data

Empirical Research on the Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment Location Choice

Government Size and Regional Capital Flows in China

Government Spending,Liquidity Shocks and Real Business Cycle in China

A Study of Effect of Trade Open on Financial Development

Can greater openness improve green economy efficiency of countries along the Belt and Road Initiative?

Government Size, Market-Orientation and Regional Corruption: Evidence from the Provincial Level Panel Data

Openness Efficiency of Developing Economies:A Panel Data Study Based on SFA Technique

Government Intervention,Economic Freedom and Entrepreneurship

Does flattening government improve economic performance? Evidence from China

Does Capital Account Openness Increase Income Inequality?-Analysis Based on Cross-Country Panel Data

Is Government Spending a Free Lunch? -- Evidence from China

Determinants of economic growth in China: Private enterprise, education, and openness

An Empirical Analysis of Openness and Economic Growth of Coastal Area in East China

Does Trade Openness Affect Taxation? Evidence from BRICS Countries

Financial Openness and Productivity

Influence of International Openness on Corporate Environmental Performance in China

Impact of urban economic openness on real estate prices: Evidence from thirty-five cities in China

Does Flattening Government Improve Economic Performance?