Binuclear chromium carbonyl complexes of methylaminobis(difluorophosphine): metal–metal bonds versus four-electron donor bridging carbonyl groups
Huijuan Miao,Xiuhui Zhang,Yang Bai,Qian-shu Li,R. Bruce King
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nj00295e
IF: 3.3
2017-01-01
New Journal of Chemistry
Abstract:Binuclear chromium carbonyl complexes of the general type [MeN(PF2)(2)](m)Cr-2(CO)(n), including the experimentally known [MeN(PF2)(2)](3)Cr-2(CO)(n) (n = 6, 5) species, have been studied by density functional theory (DFT) methods. The lowest energy structures for the three series of [MeN(PF2)(2)](m)Cr-2(CO)(n) (m = 1, 2, 3) structures can be grouped into three triads, namely [MeN(PF2)(2)]Cr-2(CO)(n) (n = 10, 9, 8), [MeN(PF2)(2)](2)Cr-2(CO)(n) (n = 8, 7, 6), and [MeN(PF2)(2)](3)Cr-2(CO)(n) (n = 6, 5, 4). The carbonyl richest structures of each triad, namely [MeN(PF2)(2)]Cr-2(CO)(10), [MeN(PF2)(2)](2)Cr-2(CO)(8), and [MeN(PF2)(2)](3)Cr-2(CO)(6) have all terminal carbonyl groups, no chromium-chromium bond, and the MeN(PF2)(2) ligands bridging the pair of chromium atoms. However, for [MeN(PF2)(2)](3)Cr-2(CO)(6) a structure with two of the three MeN(PF2)(2) ligands chelating to single chromium atoms are energetically competitive. Low-energy singlet spin state structures for the intermediate and carbonyl poorest members of each triad can incorporate a variety of features such as chromium-chromium single and double bonds, MeN(PF2)(2) ligands split into bridging MeNPF2 + PF2 groups, and four-electron donor bridging eta(2)-mu-CO groups as required to give each chromium atom the favored 18-electron configuration. Such four-electron donor bridging eta(2)-mu-CO groups are not found in low-energy structures of related binuclear carbonyl complexes [MeN(PF2)(2)](m)M-2(CO)(n) (M = Fe, Ni; m = 1, 2) of the later transition metals iron and nickel.