Abstract:DNA analysis is used to detect attempts at manipulating or substituting samples during doping control. To determine a suitable method, mitochondrial DNA testing and short tandem repeat (STR) analysis were compared by conducting sensitivity, repeatability, concordance, and case‐type sample studies. Mitochondrial DNA testing is more valuable for analyzing low‐concentration and highly degraded DNA samples, such as urine samples in doping control, compared with STR analysis. Doping offenses involve the use or attempted use of any prohibited method or substance as well as substituting samples. Consequently, it has been recommended that short tandem repeat (STR) analysis be used to determine if the doping control samples are from the same athlete. However, it has been recognized that it may be difficult to obtain full STR analysis using negligible amounts of DNA samples. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is characterized by its stability and high cellular copy number. Therefore, mtDNA testing in urine is expected to be used to analyze samples that cannot be analyzed using STR analysis. The objective of this study was to compare mtDNA testing with STR analysis by conducting sensitivity, concordance (whole blood, dried blood spot, and urine), and case‐type studies. In sensitivity studies, mtDNA testing exhibited greater sensitivity compared with STR analysis. Concordance studies indicated that all samples were consistent with the mtDNA sequences and STR profiles. Allelic dropout occurred in some urine samples that were examined for STR analysis. Case‐type sample studies demonstrated that mtDNA testing could be used to obtain DNA profiles of all the samples tested, including blood, dried blood spots, urine, blood residues on needles, and blood stains. In conclusion, mtDNA testing is valuable for analyzing highly degraded DNA samples, such as urine samples, compared with STR analysis. Urine testing should be performed for the initial testing procedure, because mtDNA is inherited maternally. In situations where the DNA match is detrimental to the athlete, additional blood STR analysis may be required.

Hair Analysis and Its Use in Doping Identification

Probing the hair detectability of prohibited substances in sports: an in vivo-in silico-clinical approach and analytical implications compared with plasma, urine, and faeces

Current status of hair analysis in forensic toxicology in China

Simultaneous Determination of 12 Illicit Drugs in Hair Sample by the Nano-Titania-modified Covalent Organic Frameworks (Ntm-Cofs) On-Line Pass-Through Cleanup Followed by UPLC-MS/MS

Brain Microdialysis Study of Meropenem in Two Patients with Acute Brain Injury

Research Progresses of Anabolic Steroids Analysis in Doping Control

Individual identification method using samples associated with doping tests: A comparison of mitochondrial and nuclear genetic data

Analyzing Hair for Drug Traces: A Review of Electrochemical Approaches

A Review of Recent Progress in Drug Doping and Gene Doping Control Analysis

Interest of hair tests to discriminate a tail end of a doping regimen from a possible contamination in case of challenging an anti-doping rule violation. V. Case reports involving trimetazidine, a drug where the concentration after a single 20 mg dose has been established

Analytical challenges in sports drug testing

Analytical techniques for screening of cannabis and derivatives from human hair specimens

Association of Official Racing Chemists guidelines for drug testing in animal hair for doping control

Simultaneous detection of three hypoxia‐inducible factor stabilizers—molidustat, roxadustat, and vadadustat—in multiple keratinized matrices and its application in a doping context

Metabonomic Study of Biochemical Changes in Human Hair of Heroin Abusers by Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Ion Trap-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry

Application of hair analysis to document illegal 5-methoxy-N,N-dissopropyltrptamine (5-MeO-DiPT) use.

Protein Chips for High-Throughput Doping Screening in Athletes

A Comprehensive and High-Throughput Screening Multiple Prohibited Substances Method by UPLC-QE Plus-HRMS and HPLC-QQQ-MS in Human Urine for Doping Control

Advances in testing for sample manipulation in clinical and forensic toxicology—part B: hair samples

Detection and quantification of etomidate and metomidate in human hairs by ultraperformance liquid chromatography with triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (UPLC−MS/MS)

Annual banned-substance review: analytical approaches in human sports drug testing.