Abstract:The limits of justice mean the scope and boundaries of judicial power. This problem relates to the fundamentals of judicial power, such as the suability of disputes and rights, the justice activism and its limits, how to protect rights in the field of social self—organization, and how the justice impact the public policy, etc. Courts in China expanded its powers actively in the initial stage of judicial reform, but today, from one extreme to another, courts often use self—restriction strategies when they face the complexity of social contradictions. This paper tries to draw a relatively specific and clear boundary for judicial power from both theory and practice aspects. The supply of justice is determined by social needs, but the capacity of judicial power is limited, and its function depends on certain conditions. For example, justice can not handle the disputes which lack of one party. Both the number of the litigants and the complexity of the case affect the capacity of judicial power. While justice specializes in deciding the right disputes in the field of purely private interests, the limited nature of judicial function would be revealed when the dispute concerns group disputes, public interest, social self—reduction and the field of science and technology. Judicial power shall abide by its own borders. The limits of justice also remind judges that they must think just like judges rather than legislators, and use the logic of law instead of the logical of moral to demonstrate decision reasons. In the view of protecting litigious right, courts shall not refuse to judge for any reason. So the limits of justice in disputes settlement often lead to the tension between the safeguard of litigious right and the boundary of judicial power. Therefore, the system designs need to find a balance between them. The key is to set up mechanisms for identification and diversion according to the principle of judicial power operation, so that litigable disputes can access to the courts smoothly and those not suit to justice can be diverted to other agencies. To keep restraint on the matter beyond its capacity is the necessary guarantee for judicial authority.

The (possible) Costs and Limits of Sociological Jurisprudence——A Review of Pound's Jurisprudence(Vol.I) under the Perspective of Social Integration

Some Concepts of Jurisprudence of Economic Analysis

Judging the Method of Economic Analysis of Law

Sociological Jurisprudence Past and Present

Revisiting Pound’s Law in Action and Ehrlich’s Living Law to Find the “Gap”: A Compilation of Lecture Notes

Social Justice or Individual Freedom:An Inquiry into the Ultimate Pursuit of Pound's Interest Theory

A Corpus-Based Interpretation of the Discourse–cognitive–society Triangle on Chinese Court Judgments

The Social-Political Basis of Philosophy of Law——a Study on "the Approach to the Social-Political Philosophy of Law" in the Establishment of Marx's Theory of Law

Functionalist Interpretation of Legal History and Its Limits——A review on Law and Society in Traditional China by Ch'u T'ung-tsu

A Pragmatic Turn In The Interpretation Of Court Judgments

Law As a Culturally Constituted Sign-System – A Space for Interpretation

Law in Social Theory: Origins, Theories and Questions

A Sociosemiotic Interpretation of Linguistic Modality in Legal Settings

The Relationship between Economics, Politics and the Law in the Formation of Public Policy

One Dimensional versus Interactive View on Economic Analysis of Law:An Academic Dialogue with Judge Posner

How is the Law Possible:The Construction of System Through"The Second-order Observation":Entering the Core of Niklas Luhmann's Sociological Law

On the Conceptual Structure of the Legal System:From the Perspective of the Jurisprudence of Value

Sociology of Justice

Criticism of the Source-based Criteria of Legal Validity——Review on Anatomy of the Law Written by Lon Fuller

A Politicized Legal Method

Limits of Justice: Between Judicial Activism and Judicial Restraint