Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Analyses of the Osseointegration of Microscrews with Different Surgical Techniques in Beagle Dogs.

Xiuping Wu,Feng Deng,Zhiqiang Wang,Zhihe Zhao,Jun Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.05.031

2008-01-01

Oral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology

Abstract:Objectives. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the difference between the drill-free method and the drilling method regarding their effects on microscrew stability after 2, 4 and 8 weeks of implantation.Study design. Thirty-six screw-type microscrews were inserted into the buccal region of the maxilla in 6 beagle dogs. The microscrews were divided into 2 groups of 18 each: the drill-free group and the drilling group. Microscrews in the drill-free group were inserted without drilling, and those in the drilling group were inserted into the site that had been drilled with a pilot drilling bur. After 2, 4, and 8 weeks of healing, the dogs were killed and all bone-screw specimens were prepared for biomechanical testing, histologic observation, and histomorphometric evaluation.Results. Histologic observations revealed a continuing bone remodeling with new bone formation in the periscrew region in both groups. The pullout force and the bone-implant contact were significantly higher in the drill-free groups compared with the drilling groups for the 2 and 4 weeks (P < .05), but there was no significant difference after 8 weeks' healing period (P > .05).Conclusions. The present study demonstrated that drill-free microscrews could provide stronger stability in the maxilla than the drilling microscrews in the early phase of healing. (Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 644-50)