Abstract:The European regulation REACh (Registration, Evaluation, Authorization, and restriction of Chemicals) has placed responsibility on the industry to manage the risk from chemicals since 2006. In order to ensure a high level of protection of human health and environment, toxicity prediction methods are now a widely used tool for regulatory decision making and selection of leads in new substances design. These in silico methods are an alternative to traditional in vitro and in vivo testing methods, which are laborious, time‐consuming, highly expensive, and even involve animal welfare issues. Many computational methods have been employed to predict the toxicity profile of substances, but they are mostly adapted to pharmaceutical molecules and not to High Energetic Materials (HEMs). In line with these restrictions, ArianeGroup set up a collaborative project with the French CNRS to develop optimized tools for the prediction of HEM properties, such as genotoxicity. Several in silico methods can be used to predict the properties of molecules, such as QSAR, Local QSAR or Machine Learning. We already demonstrated that using Local QSAR allows for better predictions with a good reliability. We therefore developed a genotoxicity prediction tool based on the structural similarity search coupled with a supervised machine learning algorithm. This tool is composed of 3 predictive models: the Ames test, the Chromosomal Aberration test and the Mouse Lymphoma Assay. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the performance of these models to predict the genotoxicity of HEMs. We also present the methodology we applied to build these models and to optimize their performances. The dimensional reduction of the training set and the hyperparameters tuning of the different algorithms showed a performance acceleration and a significant reduction of the overfitting, which caused a decline in the generalization capacity of the predictive models. The performance of the predictive models was evaluated on a test set of HEMs and compared to the results of other prediction softwares.

Evolutionary Ensemble for In Silico Prediction of Ames Test Mutagenicity

Genetic Ensemble of Extreme Learning Machine

Predicting and investigating cytotoxicity of nanoparticles by translucent machine learning

Development of a robust Machine learning model for Ames test outcome prediction

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Ames Mutagenicity

Amesformer: a graph transformer neural network for mutagenicity prediction

Amesformer: State-of-the-Art Mutagenicity Prediction with Graph Transformers

DeepAmes: A deep learning-powered Ames test predictive model with potential for regulatory application

Rapid Prediction of Chemical Ecotoxicity Through Genetic Algorithm Optimized Neural Network Models

In silico genotoxicity prediction by similarity search and machine learning algorithm: optimization and validation of the method for High Energetic Materials

NeuTox: A weighted ensemble model for screening potential neuronal cytotoxicity of chemicals based on various types of molecular representations

Mechanistic Task Groupings Enhance Multitask Deep Learning of Strain-Specific Ames Mutagenicity

AMPred-CNN: Ames mutagenicity prediction model based on convolutional neural networks

Prediction of Protein Allosteric Sites with Transfer Entropy and Spatial Neighbor-Based Evolutionary Information Learned by an Ensemble Model

Evolutionary context-integrated deep sequence modeling for protein engineering

A machine learning approach for reliable prediction of amino acid interactions and its application in the directed evolution of enantioselective enzymes

An Ensemble Framework for Improving the Prediction of Deleterious Synonymous Mutation

Nature-Inspired Neural Network Ensemble Learning

Predicting the Reproductive Toxicity of Chemicals Using Ensemble Learning Methods and Molecular Fingerprints.

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Neurotoxicity Using Machine Learning.

Ensemble Structure of Evolutionary Artificial Neural Networks